An evaluation method of team situation awareness based on mutual belief

Nonose, Kohei; Kanno, Taro; Furuta, K.

doi:10.1007/s10111-008-0127-y

Cited by 20 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For example, Shu and Furuta (2005) have defined TSA using the concept of mutual beliefs and proposed a simulation-based TSA assessment based on the framework of the team intention inference method (Kanno et al 2003. Nonose et al (2010) have developed a SAGAT-based team SA measurement by introducing the concept of mutual beliefs. They have introduced two new criteria, 'soundness' and 'completeness', for the assessment of TSA like shown in Table 1.…”

Section: The Notion Of Sharedness Based On This Modelmentioning

confidence: 99%

A model of team cognition based on mutual beliefs

Kanno

Furuta

Kitahara

2013

Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article proposes a generic model of team cognition based on mutual beliefs that provide foundations for the formulation of hypotheses and predictions concerning cognitive aspects of team interactions such as team situation awareness, team communication and cooperation, as well as human-agent interactions. The proposed model describes team cognition as a set of individual cognition (processes, states and mental constructs) and beliefs on the other member's cognition and beliefs (mutual beliefs). One of the advantages of the introduction of the concept of mutual beliefs is that it can theoretically distinguish what is really shared among team members and what is only believed to be shared. This model also provides a framework to describe reasons and internal processes behind team interaction and communication in terms of team member's cognitive status and mutual beliefs.

show abstract

Section: The Notion Of Sharedness Based On This Modelmentioning

confidence: 99%

A model of team cognition based on mutual beliefs

Kanno

Furuta

Kitahara

2013

Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In addition to these four classes of human tasks, many authors-for example, De Keyser et al (1987); Van Daele and De Keyser (1990); Artman and Waern (1999); Klein (2006); Kontogiannis (2010); Nonose et al (2010)-insist specifically on the collective aspect of work, which must be carefully considered by designers. Indeed, in certain situations inherent to the tasks described earlier, human operators must organize a distribution of actions over time.…”

Section: The Importance Of Supervisory Hci In Industrial Situationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The performance of future designers on the specification of supervisory HCI: case study of a simulated work situation

2011

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article concerns the performance of future designers on the specification of supervisory humancomputer interfaces (HCI). This paper reports the results of a case study of a simulated work situation. Sixty-three groups of 3-5 students (Master's program in Electrical Engineering and Industrial Informatics) were involved. In this article, we first describe the study context and explain how we ran it. Next, we describe the industrial process to be supervised, composed of five interconnected stations. We then present our informal analysis of the global study. After our informal analysis, the article focuses on a second level of analysis, based on the 63 HCI specification reports produced by the groups. Each report is analyzed according to eight groups of criteria. The results of this second-level analysis are presented and discussed.

show abstract

“…Despite the different views on TSA, researchers generally agreed on the positive relation between TSA and team performance. In laboratory studies, for example, teams scoring better on queries assessing situation comprehension and projection were also performing at a higher level (Foltz et al, 2008), Similarly, belief based indexes for TSA (Nonose, Kanno, &Furuta, 2010) demonstrated unique contribution to team performance.…”

Section: Situation Awareness (Sa) In Team Settingsmentioning

confidence: 94%

Situation awareness, communication, and teamwork : re-examining the role of a team display in wildland firefighting command and control

Ma¹

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The author has granted a non exclusive license allowing Library and Archives Canada to reproduce, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, communicate to the public by telecommunication or on the Internet, loan, distrbute and sell theses worldwide, for commercial or non commercial purposes, in microform, paper, electronic and/or any other formats. AVIS: L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public par telecommunication ou par I'lnternet, preter, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans le monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, sur support microforme, papier, electronique et/ou autres formats. Bien que ces formulaires aient inclus dans la pagination, il n'y aura aucun contenu manquant.

show abstract

An evaluation method of team situation awareness based on mutual belief

Cited by 20 publications

References 8 publications

A model of team cognition based on mutual beliefs

A model of team cognition based on mutual beliefs

The performance of future designers on the specification of supervisory HCI: case study of a simulated work situation

Situation awareness, communication, and teamwork : re-examining the role of a team display in wildland firefighting command and control

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About