1987
DOI: 10.1016/0165-4101(87)90004-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An evaluation of alternative proxies for the market's assessment of unexpected earnings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
155
2
6

Year Published

1990
1990
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 361 publications
(173 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
8
155
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…To abstract from market-wide movements in size, I measure relative size as the firm's NYSE market value of equity fractile. I examine firm size because there is evidence that firm size is negatively related to the information content of accounting earnings releases [Atiase (1985), Brown et al (1987b), Grant (1980)]. An increase in the relative size of optioned firms, therefore, would potentially explain the smaller post-listing announcement effects.…”
Section: The Alternative 'Selection Bias' Explanationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To abstract from market-wide movements in size, I measure relative size as the firm's NYSE market value of equity fractile. I examine firm size because there is evidence that firm size is negatively related to the information content of accounting earnings releases [Atiase (1985), Brown et al (1987b), Grant (1980)]. An increase in the relative size of optioned firms, therefore, would potentially explain the smaller post-listing announcement effects.…”
Section: The Alternative 'Selection Bias' Explanationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, I expect to observe a smaller slope coefficient in the period after options listing, as increased measurement error attenuates the size of the measured coefficient. Brown et al (1987b) regress announcement-period abnormal returns on measures of unexpected earnings for large and small firms and find smaller slope coefficients and R-squared values for the large firms. They interpret this as evidence that measurement error in their unexpected-earnings proxy (they also use Value Line forecasts) is positively related to firm size, because 'larger firms are subject to closer scrutiny by equity analysts and earnings information of large firms generally is available earlier to the market' (p. 178).…”
Section: Conditional Information Contentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…earnings news is associated with stock price declines (Brown et al 1987). Thus, shortsellers have incentives to uncover information that helps them anticipate future earnings news.…”
Section: Empirical Predictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Long-term growth forecasts are essential because of their influence on valuation estimates [41]. Prior literature reports that investors generally count on analysts' forecasts of long-term growth, because analysts are assumed to have information and timing advantages over model-based forecasts [41][42][43]. Specifically, the Gordon's growth model [44] documents that a price-to-dividend ratio of 30 means that a 1% increase in long-term dividend growth results in a 30% stock return.…”
Section: Long-term Growth Forecasts Of Financial Analysts and Corporamentioning
confidence: 99%