2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3770(03)00105-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An evaluation of approaches used to determine the distribution and biomass of emergent and submerged aquatic macrophytes over large spatial scales

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
80
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
80
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several authors, in fact, reported data that highlighted how July-August is the period of maximum rhizophyte biomass in temperate regions (Vis et al 2003;Bolpagni et al 2007) where usually plant senescence only starts at the end of September (Bolpagni et al 2007;Pierobon et al 2010).…”
Section: Image Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several authors, in fact, reported data that highlighted how July-August is the period of maximum rhizophyte biomass in temperate regions (Vis et al 2003;Bolpagni et al 2007) where usually plant senescence only starts at the end of September (Bolpagni et al 2007;Pierobon et al 2010).…”
Section: Image Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, aquatic plants and their properties are not as easily detectable as terrestrial vegetation. Vis et al (2003), however, demonstrated that remote sensing techniques are useful for investigating the shifts in the assemblages of primary producers by monitoring the distribution of aquatic macrophytes and changes in the layout of aquatic plant communities. As pointed out by a review of extant literature, major technical difficulties are met when vegetation is submerged or flooded; in fact the presence of water can alter the spectral characteristics of the images (an exhaustive discussion is presented in Silva et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional field surveys of macrophyte communities are difficult to implement, requiring considerable time and expense to carry out over large spatial scales [4]. Even worse, traditional field-based surveys are commonly hindered by limited accessibility [5]. The technology of remote sensing has the advantage of a broad coverage and frequent data acquisitions, which makes it a valuable tool for the assessment of macrophyte distribution, vegetation status and related biophysical parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that different types of aquatic vegetation have subtly different spectral reflectance signatures, which differ greatly from open water and non-vegetated areas (Marshall and Lee 1994, Ozesmi and Bauer 2002, Penuelas et al 1993. However, in the case of mixed beds, the varying contribution of each emergent macrophytes species to the total coverage remains difficult (Underwood et al 2006, Vis et al 2003.…”
Section: Remote Sensing and Gis For Aquatic Plant Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%