2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10457-009-9203-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An evaluation of farmers’ experiences planting native trees in rural Panama: implications for reforestation with native species in agricultural landscapes

Abstract: In the Republic of Panama, reforestation with native species is of great interest, but many landholders often do not participate in tree planting projects and little information exists about landholder interest in, or experiences with, native trees. This study evaluates the experiences of farmers participating in a native species reforestation initiative in rural Panama to identify lessons learned that can guide on-going or future tree planting efforts. Based on the results of a questionnaire administered to p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
59
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
59
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings from our survey are supported by results from another study in Los Santos stating that 79% of respondents plant fruit trees near their homes (Garen et al, 2011). Another survey in Los Santos similarly found that wood and fruit rank first and second in tree uses reported by plantation owners, and a survey in neighboring Herrera province indicated that 80-85% of pasture owners also retain trees for wood and fruit (Love and Spaner, 2005;Garen et al, 2009). Yet another survey conducted at five sites in Panama found that fruit, fuelwood, and wood were the three benefits of trees most commonly mentioned by farmers (Fischer and Vasseur, 2002).…”
Section: Factors Influencing the Decision To Protect Or Plant Treessupporting
confidence: 83%
“…These findings from our survey are supported by results from another study in Los Santos stating that 79% of respondents plant fruit trees near their homes (Garen et al, 2011). Another survey in Los Santos similarly found that wood and fruit rank first and second in tree uses reported by plantation owners, and a survey in neighboring Herrera province indicated that 80-85% of pasture owners also retain trees for wood and fruit (Love and Spaner, 2005;Garen et al, 2009). Yet another survey conducted at five sites in Panama found that fruit, fuelwood, and wood were the three benefits of trees most commonly mentioned by farmers (Fischer and Vasseur, 2002).…”
Section: Factors Influencing the Decision To Protect Or Plant Treessupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Globally, about 1.2 billion people are using agroforestry methods in their farms [38]. In integrating trees into farms, the farmers have to be careful; the types of trees to be planted should be indigenous fruit trees [39] that have implications on planting decisions which are also impacted by socio-cultural values [40], market, food and the medicinal value of trees [33]. Examples of such trees may include: pawpaw, cocoa, coffee, avocado, mango, cashew and banana, etc.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An evaluation of farmers' experiences planting native trees in rural Panama: implications for reforestation with native species in agricultural landscapes (Garen et al 2009) reported all participants in the program considered their experience to be positive, few had problems with their plantations, and most were interested in planting more native trees. The program's frequent and ongoing technical support was an important factor for farmers.…”
Section: Requirements Of Plant Species For Agroforestrymentioning
confidence: 99%