An evaluation of German active labour market policies: a review of the empirical evidence

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to review the results of studies that investigate the most important active labour market policy (ALMP) measures in Germany. A focus is also on programmes devoted to foster entrepreneurship which can make important contributions to a country’s growth and social welfare. Design/methodology/approach The study relies on quantitative and qualitative assessments and a comparison of results of previous studies on ALMPs. Findings The available evidence suggests that most ALMP measures increase labour market prospects of the participants. In particular, evaluations of the entrepreneurship promotion activities show high success rates as well as high cost efficiency. The bulk share of participants of entrepreneurship measures is still self-employed after several years and nearly one-third of these businesses had at least one employee. The authors mention problems regarding the evaluation of previous programmes and highlight future challenges of German ALMP. Originality/value This is the first study on ALMP that has an extensive and explicit focus on entrepreneurship-promoting programs.

The Legal Implications of Public Support Policies Targeting Research, Development and Innovation in the European Union

“…State aid (SDG 9; Nyman-Metcalf, Dutt & Chochia, 2014;Zollner, Fritsch & Wyrwich, 2016, pp. 29-30); Identification and mobilisation of financial resources (SDG 12;Leloux & Groen, 2009, p. 15;Zollner, Fritsch & Wyrwich, 2016); Financial incentives such as tax breaks, grants, subsidised loans, loan guarantees, etc. (SDG 12;Groen, 2005, pp.…”

A Reform Strategy for Germany

“…The regulation also came with new active labor market policy tools to promote start-ups by the unemployed (Ich AG/"Me Inc."). The evidence on the success of these measures to date is mixed (Zöllner et al 2018). While some do succeed in leaving the program and generate an income, most of these start-ups are not very innovative and have low growth potential.…”

Technological Innovation and Inclusive Growth in Germany

“…37 These policies amount to about 1 percent of GDP at present, compared to 2 percent in Denmark, where they have been found to be effective. Zöllner et al (2016) evaluate a range of entrepreneurship promotion programs (including bridging allowances and start-up subsidies) within Germany's ALMP and find that they had 'high success rates as well as high cost efficiency'. This recommendation resonates with the evaluation of the German social welfare system by Snower et al (2009, p.155) who identify as crucial problem 'a lack of adaptability and versatility [of the labor force] in the presence of the reorganization of production and work in response to technology-driven globalization processes' which requires state support to allow these laborers to 'turn themselves into winners through their own efforts'.…”

“…Among these are active labor market policies, which consist, for example, of policies to encourage entrepreneurship. A recent evaluation of these measures find them to be overall successful (Zöllner et al, 2016). The long-term competitiveness of Germany's manufacturing sector will depend more than ever on the extent to which the required skills (termed '21st century skills') will be available in the economy.…”