1997 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.1997.595379
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An evaluation of SAR image compression techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4(c)-4(f), it is observed that the result of the proposed method is better than others. To measure the performance quantitatively, the peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) 22 is calculated, which is defined as PSNR ¼ 10 log 10 ðMAX − MINÞ 2 MSE ;…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4(c)-4(f), it is observed that the result of the proposed method is better than others. To measure the performance quantitatively, the peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) 22 is calculated, which is defined as PSNR ¼ 10 log 10 ðMAX − MINÞ 2 MSE ;…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose is to compress the data via some transformation, which leaves the data and noise separate, and inverse transform only the section corresponding to the data to remove the noise. These techniques have been primarily explored via the wavelet transform, the cosine transform, and the Karhunen-Loeve transform [25][26][27][28][29] .…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%