2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110350
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An evaluation of statistical models for age estimation and the assessment of the 18-year threshold using conventional pelvic radiographs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Real femur images for each age category are separately distributed except for age [12][13][14][15] and [16][17][18][19] since bone growth becomes slower until it ceases altogether (Figure 5). Meanwhile, distributions of real phalange images for age [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] highly overlap due to its smaller growth. BAPGAN-generated images have similar distributions to the real ones.…”
Section: T-sne Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Real femur images for each age category are separately distributed except for age [12][13][14][15] and [16][17][18][19] since bone growth becomes slower until it ceases altogether (Figure 5). Meanwhile, distributions of real phalange images for age [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] highly overlap due to its smaller growth. BAPGAN-generated images have similar distributions to the real ones.…”
Section: T-sne Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because skeletal maturity progresses through discrete stages, pediatric medicine has correlated children's chronological age with bone age to investigate endocrinology, genetic, and growth disorders; but, time-consuming manual bone age assessment methods [1,2] suffer from intra-and interobserver variability. In this context, Convolutional Neural Networks have shown great promise in age assessment on various modalities and body regions, including hand/pelvic X-ray [3,4], clavicula Computed Tomography [5], and hand Magnetic Resonance Imaging [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 Within the pelvis, the iliac crest, a secondary ossification centre, displays a relatively longer development period and, thus, presents as a reliable age marker in sub-adults and young adults. 4,[23][24][25] Previously undertaken investigations with the iliac crest have indicated a good correlation between apophyseal ossification/ fusion changes and age, [26][27][28][29] signifying its utility as an age marker. Numerous scoring approaches for iliac crest ossification and fusion have been devised and researched in the past.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…71 On the other hand, a handful of observational studies employed regression analysis 37,38,68 and Bayesian inference 37,64 for the age estimation from the iliac crest. Machine learning is presented as another efficient statistical tool, believed to yield more accurate estimates of age 28,67 by eliminating the influence of human bias. [72][73][74] Currently, studies utilizing machine learning for iliac crest age estimation are limited to the modified Kreitner-Kellinghaus scoring method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation