1977
DOI: 10.1007/bf00884786
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An evaluation of the effectiveness of a telephone counseling center

Abstract: Three-thousand questionnaires were distributed to students on campus to identify a sample of actual telephone counseling center users and their ratings of the effectiveness of the help received and of the counselor. Ratings of help received and impact of counseling on life as it is today were considered for sex of caller and counselor across type of problem. A sample of 66 actual callers was identified who had used the service for personal problems at least once. Of male callers, 67% reported that telephone co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
11
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
5
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The population samples in this body of literature are typically restricted and potentially biased. For example, some evaluators have questioned only college or high school students (King, 1977; Slem & Cotler, 1973). Typically, information can be obtained only from those callers who consent to being re‐contacted; as a result, compliance rates are only 45–61% (Getz, Fujita, & Allen, 1975; Motto, 1971).…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The population samples in this body of literature are typically restricted and potentially biased. For example, some evaluators have questioned only college or high school students (King, 1977; Slem & Cotler, 1973). Typically, information can be obtained only from those callers who consent to being re‐contacted; as a result, compliance rates are only 45–61% (Getz, Fujita, & Allen, 1975; Motto, 1971).…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most favorable ratings appear to be obtained when the actual counsellor or an agency staff member questions the caller (e.g., Getz et al, 1975), compared with when independent evaluators are involved (e.g., Hornblow & Sloane, 1980). Furthermore, male callers tend to give lower ratings than females (King, 1977), as do callers with serious mental illness or drug abuse (Gretz et al, 1975).…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Service utilization surveys of adolescents indicate that despite high awareness of hotlines and high satisfaction ratings among those who do contact hotlines, adolescents access hotlines infrequently (King, 1977; Slem & Colter, 1973) and less than they access other help sources (Offer, Howard, Schonert, & Ostrov, 1991; Vieland, Whittle, Garland, Hicks, & Shaffer, 1991). In a sample of 1,763 high school students, Slem and Cotler (1973) assessed the awareness and utilization of a telephone crisis hotline in suburban Detroit.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ninety‐eight percent of adolescents had been aware of the service, 5.6% had contacted the hotline, and 68% of users had found it useful. In a sample of 3,000 Alabama college students, King (1977) identified 66 (2.2%) who had called a limited‐hour telephone counseling center. Over two‐thirds of all callers rated the hotline as somewhat effective to extremely effective.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Women use suicide hot lines more than men do, and are typically more satisfied with their hot line experience than are men. Although most users find hot lines to be helpful, about one-third of men and one-fifth of women report that the advice they were given made their problem worse (King, 1977).…”
Section: Guidelines For Administratorsmentioning
confidence: 99%