2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.07.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An evaluation of the impact of multiwalled carbon nanotubes on soil microbial community structure and functioning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

6
68
1
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
6
68
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The atrazine concentration chosen could be relevant in a spatially focused release scenario. The test concentrations of CNTs were comparable to other studies in which the impacts of CNTs on environmental microorganism were assessed [21,22]. Within the concentration range some toxic or inhibitory effects on bacteria were reported [21,22].…”
Section: Biodegradation Of Atrazine By Arthrobacter Sp In the Presensupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The atrazine concentration chosen could be relevant in a spatially focused release scenario. The test concentrations of CNTs were comparable to other studies in which the impacts of CNTs on environmental microorganism were assessed [21,22]. Within the concentration range some toxic or inhibitory effects on bacteria were reported [21,22].…”
Section: Biodegradation Of Atrazine By Arthrobacter Sp In the Presensupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The test concentrations of CNTs were comparable to other studies in which the impacts of CNTs on environmental microorganism were assessed [21,22]. Within the concentration range some toxic or inhibitory effects on bacteria were reported [21,22]. The flasks were shaken at 160 rpm in the dark at 30 • C for 4 h. Next, degradation was initiated by inoculating the flasks with 1 mL of the cell suspension at an initial cell concentration of 2 × 10 7 CFU/mL.…”
Section: Biodegradation Of Atrazine By Arthrobacter Sp In the Presensupporting
confidence: 55%
“…In the same range of concentrations, no modification of microbial activities (soil respiration and enzymatic activities) was reported for MWCNT (Shrestha et al 2013), except for the highest concentrations used (500 and 5000 mg kg −1 soil) (Chung et al 2011). Likewise, SWCNT caused a reduction of the enzymatic activities only at high concentrations (300 to 1000 mg kg −1 soil) (Jin et al 2013).…”
Section: Impact Ofcarbon Nanoparticles (Fullerene and Cnts)mentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Pyrosequencing data indicated that MWCNT (10 g kg −1 soil) induced an enrichment of potential degraders of recalcitrant contaminants (PAH) Rhodococcus, Cellulomonas, Norcardioles, and Pseudomonas, while some bacterial genera like Derxia, Holophaga, Opitutus, and Waddlia were decreased (Shrestha et al 2013). Using a comparative metagenomic analysis of bacterial communities, Khodakovskaya et al (2013) found that the diversity and richness of bacterial communities were not affected by MWCNTs, while a significant modification of the bacterial composition was observed.…”
Section: Impact Of Carbon Nanoparticles (Fullerene and Cnts)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The toxicity, metabolism and transport of nanoparticles are related to the humic acid, organic matter, pH and ionic strengths of the host soil (Tourinho et al 2012;Wang et al 2011;Zhu et al 2014). Therefore, it is very important to understand the behavior of nanoparticles in soil and to evaluate the risk of nanoparticles in arable soil ecosystems or other real environmental scenarios (Shrestha et al 2013). Free Ce was observed in soil spiked with CeO 2 nanoparticles, indicating that these elements were taken up by soil microorganisms (Vittori Antisari et al 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%