2002
DOI: 10.1016/s1469-3062(02)00067-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An evaluation of the level of ambition and implications of the Bush Climate Change Initiative

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Physical efficiency and economic intensity do not limit the total compliance costs in the case of unexpected growth, but due to the nature of the target (total allowable energy use or emissions are conditional on the activity), compliance costs do not increase as fast as is the case with volume targets, thereby reducing the uncertainty. The reduced uncertainty of costs associated with intensity targets may lead to the adoption of more stringent targets (Van Vuuren et al, 2002). Physical efficiency targets and economic intensity targets are less flexible in combination with 12 There are several restricted methods for benchmarking the energy efficiency.…”
Section: (Un)certainty Of Compliance Costsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physical efficiency and economic intensity do not limit the total compliance costs in the case of unexpected growth, but due to the nature of the target (total allowable energy use or emissions are conditional on the activity), compliance costs do not increase as fast as is the case with volume targets, thereby reducing the uncertainty. The reduced uncertainty of costs associated with intensity targets may lead to the adoption of more stringent targets (Van Vuuren et al, 2002). Physical efficiency targets and economic intensity targets are less flexible in combination with 12 There are several restricted methods for benchmarking the energy efficiency.…”
Section: (Un)certainty Of Compliance Costsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up to 2010, both profiles incorporate the implementation of the Annex I Kyoto targets for Canada, Japan and Western and Eastern Europe, and an optimal level of banking of excess emissions by the FSU. The USA follows the Bush plan (emission intensity target), but this leads to emissions which do not significantly differ from their baseline values [78]. The Annex I region, Oceania (including Australia), and the non-Annex I regions are assumed to follow their baseline emissions.…”
Section: Climate Impacts Of Stabilising At 550 and 650 Ppmv Co 2 Equimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model has also been used to evaluate the Kyoto Protocol under the Bonn and Marrakesh agreements in terms of environmental effectiveness and costs [27,28,53], the Bush Climate Change Initiative [78] and the Brazilian Proposal [26,32,34]. The model was also used to support dialogues between scientists, NGOs and policy makers (e.g., [7]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A chamada Iniciativa Bush é baseada na premissa de que o crescimento econômico não é a causa, e sim a solução do problema da mudança no clima, porque ele faz com que seja possível separar os recursos de produção das emissões de GHG. Ao contrário das metas quantitativas estabelecidas no Protocolo de Quioto, a Iniciativa Bush aponta para uma redução da intensidade de GHG, ou seja da quantidade de GHG emitido por dólar do PIB (van Vuuren et al, 2002).…”
Section: _ Introduçãounclassified