1973
DOI: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.1973.tb09037.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Evaluation of the Science Curriculum Improvement Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For students with disabilities, reading ability is one important determinant of success in traditional curricula (Cawley and Parmar 2001). Given that studies have shown that increases in reading ability are the result of increases in reasoning ability (Gleitman and Papafragou 2005;Renner et al 1973), special education students with reading difficulties may be able to benefit from interventions that target reasoning.…”
Section: Limited Research On Design For Science In Economically Disadmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For students with disabilities, reading ability is one important determinant of success in traditional curricula (Cawley and Parmar 2001). Given that studies have shown that increases in reading ability are the result of increases in reasoning ability (Gleitman and Papafragou 2005;Renner et al 1973), special education students with reading difficulties may be able to benefit from interventions that target reasoning.…”
Section: Limited Research On Design For Science In Economically Disadmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second study conducted by Renner et al [8] investigated the question of whether or not the Material Objects unit of SCIS is an effective reading readiness program for first grade students. The experimental group experienced the Material Objects unit and no reading program.…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Renner, et al (1973) concluded that first graders who used the SCIS materials had greater gains in reasoning skills, as measured by Piagetian conservation tasks, than first graders who used a textbook. Linn & Thier (1975) found that fifth graders who were taught using the SCIS materials performed better than those who did not on tasks that required identification and compensation of variables.…”
Section: Developing Scientific Reasoningmentioning
confidence: 99%