2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103849
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An evidence of cognitive benefits from immersive design review: Comparing three-dimensional perception and presence between immersive and non-immersive virtual environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
27
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the application of VR has gradually become more popular [ 30 , 31 , 32 ], a complete evaluation model of the healing effect of VR has not yet been formed in landscape therapy research under colour preference for people in mental subhealth states. The experimental scenes constructed by virtual reality technology have better performance in terms of immersion, realism, third dimension, depth of field, and even comfort [ 33 , 34 , 35 ]. In the existing research, most of the observation, questionnaire, interview, and other methods of investigation focus on the subjective behaviour and feelings of the subjects and use it as an evaluation criterion for environmental health benefits, while there are fewer related studies on the acquisition of objective parameters such as virtual environment experiments as agent indicators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the application of VR has gradually become more popular [ 30 , 31 , 32 ], a complete evaluation model of the healing effect of VR has not yet been formed in landscape therapy research under colour preference for people in mental subhealth states. The experimental scenes constructed by virtual reality technology have better performance in terms of immersion, realism, third dimension, depth of field, and even comfort [ 33 , 34 , 35 ]. In the existing research, most of the observation, questionnaire, interview, and other methods of investigation focus on the subjective behaviour and feelings of the subjects and use it as an evaluation criterion for environmental health benefits, while there are fewer related studies on the acquisition of objective parameters such as virtual environment experiments as agent indicators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, VR technologies enable users to immerse virtually in architectural spaces. VR simulations have especially become a popular technology for design review due to the 4 ELVER BOZ, DEMIRKAN, AND URGEN perceived benefits associated with the representation of scale, depth, and volume (Paes et al, 2021). Defining the boundaries of an architectural immersive environment imitates that of a visual living space.…”
Section: Virtual Reality (Vr) As An Architectural Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adoption of information technologies is considered to be an effective strategy to optimize, integrate, and support construction processes in architecture (Eastman et al, 2008; Paes, 2019). Among the many technologies, VR is a well-established research support tool in many architectural domains that focus on spatial cognition, perception, and behavior (Brade et al, 2017; De Kort et al, 2003; Higuera-Trujillo et al, 2017; Kuliga et al, 2015; Paes et al, 2017, 2021; Taşli & Özgüç, 2001) and have many advantages compared to real environments.…”
Section: Virtual Reality (Vr) As An Architectural Design Support Toolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As early as the year 2000, scholars have already used VR to represent building design 31 . VR has cognitive benefits for design review 32 and usability 33 in illustrating early architectural design. Similarly, researchers also tried to integrate BIM and VR 34–37 .…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%