2012 6th IEEE International Conference on E-Learning in Industrial Electronics (ICELIE) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/icelie.2012.6471152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An evolutionary-based educational expert system to maximize student-supervisor compatibility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When students are accepted by the university, they are usually evaluated by several common parameters facilitating supervisors to make the decision. These parameters are GPA, undergraduate university, research interest, passed courses and specific skills [7]. The studies show that supervisors tend to work with the students who share high compatibility with them [7,9].…”
Section: Student-supervisor Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…When students are accepted by the university, they are usually evaluated by several common parameters facilitating supervisors to make the decision. These parameters are GPA, undergraduate university, research interest, passed courses and specific skills [7]. The studies show that supervisors tend to work with the students who share high compatibility with them [7,9].…”
Section: Student-supervisor Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These parameters are GPA, undergraduate university, research interest, passed courses and specific skills [7]. The studies show that supervisors tend to work with the students who share high compatibility with them [7,9]. Maedeh develops an advisory agents modeling system in University of Tehran to enhance the decision making of student-supervisor selection [9].…”
Section: Student-supervisor Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Multiple methods have been proposed for supervisor selection (Mosharraf & Taghiyareh, ; Mosharraf, Taghiyareh, Soleimani & Orooji, ), such as multi‐criteria decision making (MCDM) (Datta, Beriha, Patnaik & Mahapatra, ), analytical hierarchy process (AHP) (Ray & Marakas, ) and analytic network process (ANP) (Momeni, Samimi, Afshari, Maleki & Mohammadi, ). In order to make a sensible decision, Datta et al () developed a strategic approach based on the MCDM method.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%