2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10436-012-0215-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An evolutionary CAPM under heterogeneous beliefs

Abstract: We would like to thank Cars Hommes for a stimulating discussion in the early stages of this project. We are grateful to valuable comments from two anonymous referees. Dieci gratefully acknowledges a Visiting Professor Appointment at the Quantitative Finance Research Centre, UTS Business School, during which this work was finalised. Dieci also acknowledges support from MIUR under project PRIN 2009 "Local interactions and global dynamics in economics and finance: models and tools" and from EU COST within Action … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In another influential paper, Brock and Hommes (1998) detect rational routes to randomness in an asset-pricing model in which market participants have the choice between technical and fundamental predictors. Quite similar asset pricing dynamics is obtained in the models by Diks and van der Weide (2003) and Brock et al (2005) in which speculators select between a large number of technical and fundamental predictors; in the models by Hommes et al (2005) and Diks and van der Weide (2005) in which heterogeneous speculators asynchronously update their beliefs; in the model by Anuvrief and Panchenko (2009) in which different market designs ranging from market clearing setups to market maker scenarios are explored; and in the model by Chiarella et al (2013) in which heterogeneous speculators can invest in multiple risky assets. Moreover, de Grauwe and Grimaldi (2006) discover complex endogenous dynamics in a foreign exchange market model with heterogeneous speculators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…In another influential paper, Brock and Hommes (1998) detect rational routes to randomness in an asset-pricing model in which market participants have the choice between technical and fundamental predictors. Quite similar asset pricing dynamics is obtained in the models by Diks and van der Weide (2003) and Brock et al (2005) in which speculators select between a large number of technical and fundamental predictors; in the models by Hommes et al (2005) and Diks and van der Weide (2005) in which heterogeneous speculators asynchronously update their beliefs; in the model by Anuvrief and Panchenko (2009) in which different market designs ranging from market clearing setups to market maker scenarios are explored; and in the model by Chiarella et al (2013) in which heterogeneous speculators can invest in multiple risky assets. Moreover, de Grauwe and Grimaldi (2006) discover complex endogenous dynamics in a foreign exchange market model with heterogeneous speculators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…This is different from the observations in Chiarella et al (2013) that one asset is stable and the other can be unstable in a coupled system. Intuitively, the multi-assets are coupled via the variance-covariance matrices in Chiarella et al (2013), which is in the higher order terms and hence cannot affect the local stability. However, the current model couples the two assets together even in its linearization skeleton.…”
Section: B Bistable Dynamics Of the Two Assets Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ma and Li [23] constructed a dynamic Bertrand-Stackelberg pricing model to analyze the influence of uncertain demand on the profit and complexity. Chiarella et al [24] incorporated the adaptive behavior of agents with heterogeneous beliefs and establishes an evolutionary capital asset pricing model (ECAPM) within the mean-variance framework. Ma and Pu [25] studied the Cournot-Bertrand duopoly model, analyzed the stability of the fixed points, and recognized the chaotic behavior of the system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%