2021
DOI: 10.1123/jpah.2021-0078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Evolving Model of Best Practice in a Community Physical Activity Program: A Case Study of “Active Herts”

Abstract: Background: Community-based physical activity programs typically evolve to respond to local conditions and feedback from stakeholders. Process evaluations are essential for capturing how programs are implemented, yet often fail to capture delivery evolution over time, meaning missed opportunities for capturing lessons learned. Methods: This research paper reports on a staged approach to a process evaluation undertaken within a community-based UK 12-month physical activity program that aimed to capture change a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These effects are likely to be due to the intensive first 3 months of the Active Herts programme, which offered free or subsidized access to structured exercise and sporting classes, which were then recommended for a further 9 months, with ongoing access to exercise opportunities at a small cost to the programme user. This access, alongside conversation cafes, further offered additional peer and social support (28). It must be noted at this point, however, that measured improvements in physical activity and sitting are based on self-reported data, which may be at risk of social desirability bias and over-reporting (49).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…These effects are likely to be due to the intensive first 3 months of the Active Herts programme, which offered free or subsidized access to structured exercise and sporting classes, which were then recommended for a further 9 months, with ongoing access to exercise opportunities at a small cost to the programme user. This access, alongside conversation cafes, further offered additional peer and social support (28). It must be noted at this point, however, that measured improvements in physical activity and sitting are based on self-reported data, which may be at risk of social desirability bias and over-reporting (49).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These booster sessions provided a safe space for the specialists to discuss any barriers to successful delivery of the programme, reflect on their consultation skills, for the team to give feedback on content and check the fidelity of the delivery of the programme, and to highlight what was working well and what might need to change. This process was seen as one of the strengths to the programme as highlighted in the externally-led process evaluation (28).…”
Section: Get Active Specialistsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations