1995
DOI: 10.1086/309822
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Exact Solution for Steady State Magnetic Reconnection in Three Dimensions

Abstract: An exact three-dimensional solution is derived for the steady state magnetic reconnection of incompressible, resistive plasmas. The analysis provides a natural extension of the analytic, two-dimensional reconnection solution of Craig & Henton. The solution shows how advective motions through the separatrix ''spine-curve'' lead to global current sheets aligned to the separatrix ''fan.'' Subject headings: MHD-plasmas L198 CRAIG ET AL. Vol. 455

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This expression immediately brings out the problem with steady-state, flux pile-up solutions, in which Q 2 increases indefinitely as →0. 11,[13][14][15] Since p 0 must scale as Q 2 /2 to maintain positive pressures in the reconnection region, we see that unbounded pressures are required in the limit of small . More physically, we can identify p 0 with the magnitude of external hydromagnetic pressures which sustain the background flows that stretch and amplify the disturbance field.…”
Section: E the Plasma Pressurementioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This expression immediately brings out the problem with steady-state, flux pile-up solutions, in which Q 2 increases indefinitely as →0. 11,[13][14][15] Since p 0 must scale as Q 2 /2 to maintain positive pressures in the reconnection region, we see that unbounded pressures are required in the limit of small . More physically, we can identify p 0 with the magnitude of external hydromagnetic pressures which sustain the background flows that stretch and amplify the disturbance field.…”
Section: E the Plasma Pressurementioning
confidence: 81%
“…Exact steady-state solutions of the fan current mechanism are already available. 11 What we develop here is a fully dynamic description.…”
Section: A Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been suggested that solutions for spine reconnection in incompressible plasmas [47] may not be dynamically accessible, and while incompressible fan solutions [6] are dynamically accessible [8,[71][72][73], this breaks down when the incompressibility assumption is relaxed [71]. It turns out that the generic null point reconnection mode that is observed in numerical experiments in response to shearing motions is one in which there is a strong fan current with flow across both spine and fan, and which is in some sense a combination of the spine and fan reconnection of Priest and Titov [7].…”
Section: Kinematic Resistive Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A key point is that in three dimensions reconnection occurs where a component of the electric field parallel to the magnetic field is present -and this can be in many different field configurations. For example, reconnection may occur either at null points [e.g., [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] or in the absence of null points at quasi-separatrix layers or hyperbolic flux tubes [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] or it may occur along separators that join one null point to another [7,[24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under the simplistic assumptions made by Priest & Titov (1996) this was expected to lead to current accumulation in the entire fan plane. Although it appears that such a situation would indeed occur in an incompressible plasma (Craig et al 1995;Craig & Fabling 1998;Pontin et al 2007b), when plasma compressibility is included, a local collapse of the null occurs, destroying the planar nature of the fan surface. A localised current sheet forms which is focused around the null itself, with the result that the geometry of the magnetic field around the null is significantly different from the initial linear profile.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%