1998
DOI: 10.1063/1.872754
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic magnetic reconnection in three space dimensions: Fan current solutions

Abstract: The problem of incompressible, nonlinear magnetic reconnection in three-dimensional ''open'' geometries is considered. An analytic treatment shows that dynamic ''fan current'' reconnection may be driven by superposing long wavelength, finite amplitude, plane wave disturbances onto three-dimensional magnetic X-points. The nonlinear reconnection of the field is preceded by an advection phase in which magnetic shear waves drive large currents as they localize in the vicinity of the magnetic null. Analytic argumen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
17
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Here a power law appears to fit best for both. Comparing to the flux pileup regimes the power law scaling for peak current (η −0.65 ) is comparable with those of the dynamic incompressible fan solutions of Craig & Fabling (1998): η −3/4 and those found empirically for the continuously driven case: η −0.6 ∼ η −0.8 . The reconnection rate however scales slightly faster compared to the η 0.25 scaling found in the other two cases.…”
Section: Null Displacementsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Here a power law appears to fit best for both. Comparing to the flux pileup regimes the power law scaling for peak current (η −0.65 ) is comparable with those of the dynamic incompressible fan solutions of Craig & Fabling (1998): η −3/4 and those found empirically for the continuously driven case: η −0.6 ∼ η −0.8 . The reconnection rate however scales slightly faster compared to the η 0.25 scaling found in the other two cases.…”
Section: Null Displacementsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…For most simulations it can safely be set to zero, but if it is required it is set at an extremely small value (e.g., 2 ¼ 10 À10 ) so that it only acts over a few grid points near the origin and its influence on the rest of the solution is negligible. Similar time-dependent analyses of the Craig & Henton (1995) problem have been carried out by Craig & Fabling (1998). In addition, a related problem involving one-dimensional electric current and velocity profiles was studied by Bulanov et al (1990).…”
Section: Time-dependent Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…This simple two-dimensional solution has since been modified to include the effects of threedimensionality, time dependence, and different spatial geometries (Craig & Fabling 1996, 1998Watson & Craig 2002). In this paper we extend the Craig & Henton solution to the two-fluid framework more appropriate for collisionless or semicollisional plasmas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 that the width of the current sheet depends on the imposed η value, and the graph indicates that as η approaches zero the sheet reaches a minimum thickness, controlled by numerical diffusion. Results for large η indicate a power law dependence for the thickness as a function of η, though with a smaller exponent than found in the incompressible models (Craig & Fabling 1998;Heerikhuisen & Craig 2004). One can use this to estimate the value of the numerical diffusivity, which takes effect only when structures collapse to the resolution limit, while its value decreases rapidly as the structures increase in size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Under the simplistic assumptions made by Priest & Titov (1996) this was expected to lead to current accumulation in the entire fan plane. Although it appears that such a situation would indeed occur in an incompressible plasma (Craig et al 1995;Craig & Fabling 1998;Pontin et al 2007b), when plasma compressibility is included, a local collapse of the null occurs, destroying the planar nature of the fan surface. A localised current sheet forms which is focused around the null itself, with the result that the geometry of the magnetic field around the null is significantly different from the initial linear profile.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%