1981
DOI: 10.1079/bjn19810079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An examination of factors which may affect the water holding capacity of dietary fibre

Abstract: 1. Dietary fibre has a water holding capacity (WHC) and this is a function of the fibre source and method of measurement. Water can be associated with fibre either as trapped water or bound water. This makes it difficult to predict the ability of fibre to influence stool weight in humans.2. Examination of various fibre concentrates for chemical composition, as neutral detergent fibre (NDF), acid detergent fibre (ADF) and lignin; structure, by scanning electron microscopy; WHC, by centrifugation, suggests that … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
53
0
2

Year Published

1987
1987
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
53
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…High-pressure micronisation effectively (P < 0.05) increased the swelling capacities of IFRF and cellulose by 652-767%. The ability to bind water is generally affected by the number and nature of water-binding sites as well as the fibre structure, 25 suggesting that many water-binding sites and spaces might be released by the process of micronisation. Moreover, the greatly reduced particle size and bulk density due to highpressure micronisation (Tables 1 and 3) might result in some structural changes and an increase in surface area and hence contribute to the large improvements in WHC and swelling capacity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High-pressure micronisation effectively (P < 0.05) increased the swelling capacities of IFRF and cellulose by 652-767%. The ability to bind water is generally affected by the number and nature of water-binding sites as well as the fibre structure, 25 suggesting that many water-binding sites and spaces might be released by the process of micronisation. Moreover, the greatly reduced particle size and bulk density due to highpressure micronisation (Tables 1 and 3) might result in some structural changes and an increase in surface area and hence contribute to the large improvements in WHC and swelling capacity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result agrees with previous findings that no significant correlation was found between the particle size of inuline (Fibruline), Fibrex (sieve openings 150 lm), and pea cell walls fibre (Exafine sieve openings 200-500 lm, Swelite sieve openings 100-200 lm) and their hydration properties . Certainly, no only fibre size determines its hydration, also chemical structure and shape play an essential role (Robertson & Eastwood, 1981). Therefore, general assumption about relationship between PSD and hydration can be only established within fibres subjected to different processes for particle reduction (Chau et al, 2006), and in turn, effect of particle size on water sorption cannot be generalized and must be assessed for each type of fibre (Strange & Onwulata, 2002).…”
Section: Hydration Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The water -holding capacity of the three feeds was determined using a modification of the method of Robertson & Eastwood (1981). Feed (0·5 g) and distilled water (20·0 ml) were placed into 30 ml centrifuge tubes and left to soak at room temperature for 24 h. The tubes were then centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 20 min, whereupon the excess water was decanted and the tube ends raised and left to drain for 1 h. The fresh weight of the feed was determined before oven drying at 608C for 48 h. Sample dry weight was then measured and the water -holding capacity of the feed calculated as ml water/g feed.…”
Section: Water -Holding Capacitymentioning
confidence: 99%