2010
DOI: 10.1080/19368623.2010.482850
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Examination of Purchase Decision-Making Criteria: A Case of Turkey as a Destination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding was consistent with the nature of tourism in Antalya, since most of the tours that are marketed to bring tourists to Antalya are all-inclusive packages (Ozdipciner et al, 2010). Indeed, all-inclusive package holiday concept encompasses the idea of being protected in a resort (Issa & Jayawardena, 2003).…”
Section: Theoretical Implicationssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This finding was consistent with the nature of tourism in Antalya, since most of the tours that are marketed to bring tourists to Antalya are all-inclusive packages (Ozdipciner et al, 2010). Indeed, all-inclusive package holiday concept encompasses the idea of being protected in a resort (Issa & Jayawardena, 2003).…”
Section: Theoretical Implicationssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Extensive consumer behavior research demonstrates that individuals with different educational backgrounds, occupations, or incomes tend to exhibit characteristically differentiated behavioral patterns (Ozdipciner, Li, & Uysal, 2010). In this sense, it is plausible to assume that there are relations between tourist profile, tourist satisfaction and loyalty.…”
Section: Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consumer decision-making is a prominent area of interest in consumer behavior studies (Tai, 2005), which approach the question in different ways. For example, Ozdipciner, Li, and Uysal (2010) use a frequency analysis of individual decision criteria; more systematically, conjoint analysis (Green & Srinivasan, 1978), the Consumer Styles Inventory (Sproles & Kendall, 1986), and discrete-choice analysis (DCA; Verma, Plaschka, & Louviere, 2002) have been widely deployed to understand and model consumer decision-making. Conjoint analysis relies on comparisons of experimentally designed product descriptions, focusing mostly on rating and ranking particular attribute packages (Verma et al, 2002).…”
Section: Consumer Decision-making Stylesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five attributes were selected from a collection of studies (Heung and Chu, 2000;Heung et al, 2001;Koh et al, 2010;Mak et al, 2009;Ozdipciner et al, 2010;Yavas and Babakus, 2005;Lo et al, 2013;Kucukusta et al, 2013). These five attributes were price, therapist qualification, level of privacy, range of spa facilities and product branding.…”
Section: The Conjoint Analysis Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%