2008
DOI: 10.1002/jso.21125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An examination of the efficacy of the 8 cm maximal tumor diameter cutoff for the subdivision of AJCC stage II osteosarcoma patients

Abstract: The present study shows that an 8 cm maximal tumor diameter cutoff is useful for subdividing AJCC stage II osteosarcoma patients in terms of predicting of a subsequent metastatic event. Our results suggest that the IIA and IIB subdivision in the AJCC staging system provides a basis for risk-adapted therapy when used in combination with other prognostic factors.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
7
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, similar to other prior studies [1,3,4,11], proximal tumor site had significant negative prognostic implications in our cohort of patients with extremity long bone osteosarcoma. It is unknown why proximal tumors have poor prognosis compared to distal tumors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…However, similar to other prior studies [1,3,4,11], proximal tumor site had significant negative prognostic implications in our cohort of patients with extremity long bone osteosarcoma. It is unknown why proximal tumors have poor prognosis compared to distal tumors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Although the effective cutoff range is still uncertain, tumor size has been reported as a definitive prognostic factor in osteosarcoma [20, 21]. Although the cutoff of 8 cm in maximal tumor diameter was not a prognostic factor for metastasis in our study, we integrated tumor size into our nomogram for clinical considerations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, small tumor volume. It has been reported that for osteosarcoma, less tumor size and reduction or stabilization in tumor volume represented good response to chemotherapy and thus better clinical outcome 9, 10, 24, 25. Secondly, three‐dimensional MRI imaging to accurately define that the tumor margin is suitable for hemicortical resection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%