2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2009.10.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An examination of the nature of the relationship between Leader-Member-Exchange (LMX) and turnover intent at different organizational levels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
78
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
2
78
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This function of mentoring can be clarified through leader-member exchange hypothesis (LMX), in which great LMX connections are described by appreciation and trust. Such kind of connections is cultivated by close mentoring (Graen and Uhl-Bien, 1995;Kim et al, 2010;Schyns and Croon, 2006). Accordingly, this function is advanced through different variety of methodologies that include a mentor's personal support/directing, the arrangement of kinships, or the combination of the mentees' mental soundness in their hierarchical group (Cho et al, 2011;Eby et al, 2000;Fagenson, 1992;Mullen andNoe, 1999, Kim et al, 2015).…”
Section: International Journal Of Human Resource Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This function of mentoring can be clarified through leader-member exchange hypothesis (LMX), in which great LMX connections are described by appreciation and trust. Such kind of connections is cultivated by close mentoring (Graen and Uhl-Bien, 1995;Kim et al, 2010;Schyns and Croon, 2006). Accordingly, this function is advanced through different variety of methodologies that include a mentor's personal support/directing, the arrangement of kinships, or the combination of the mentees' mental soundness in their hierarchical group (Cho et al, 2011;Eby et al, 2000;Fagenson, 1992;Mullen andNoe, 1999, Kim et al, 2015).…”
Section: International Journal Of Human Resource Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kaşlı ve Aytemiz Seymen (2010) otel işletmelerinde, kişilik özellikleri, lider-üye etkileşimi ve tükenmişlik ilişkisini araştırdığı çalışmada; kişilik özellikleri, lider-üye etkileşimi ve tükenmişlik arasında anlamlı ve pozitif ilişki olduğu saptanmıştır. Kim, Lee ve Carlson (2010) tarafından Güney Kore'de konaklama sektöründe lider-üye etkileşimi ile işgören devri ilişkisinin incelendiği çalışmada; yönetici olmayan çalışanların lider-üye etkileşimi ve işten ayrılma niyeti ilişkisinde U-biçimli eğrilerden oluşan bir ilişki oluştuğu ancak yöneticiler arasında ise bu ilişkinin doğrusal olarak gerçekleştiği belirtilmiştir. Çok yüksek kalitede lider-üye etkileşimine sahip olan işgörenlerde işten ayrılma niyetinin daha çok olduğu bulgusuna ulaşılmıştır.…”
Section: Li̇der-üye Etki̇leşi̇mi̇unclassified
“…Thus, a high quality of leader-member relationship is developed with some subordinates, while a low quality of leadermember relationship is created with other (O'Donnel et al, 2012). As what Dansenrau, (1975) and Graen (1976) posited -that most leaders develop such 'high-quality' exchange relationship with few subordinates , may be characterized as discrimination between subordinates (Dansenrau, 1995;, forming the 'in-group' versus the 'out- group' members (Graen & Cashman, 1975;in Northouse, 2013); or 'trusted assistants' versus 'hired hands' (Zalensky & Graen, 1987;in Kim et al, 2010); or employees with 'high-quality versus 'lowquality' LMX (Graen & Uhl-Bien, 1987;in Kim et al, 2010). The 'in-group' consists of highly valued employees with whom the leader forms a high quality of relationship, intensive communication and coordination that is based on expanded and negotiated role of responsibilities, that are extra working hours and task completion beyond job roles.…”
Section: Leader Member Exchange (Lmx)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theory focuses on the nature of the vertical linkages leaders create with each of their followers and their relationship to the work unit. It has developed against the arguments of the early leadership theories -leaders engage in single style of leadership with all subordinates (Danserau et al, 1975;Graen & Cashman, 1975;Dunegan, 2003;in Kim et al, 2010); whereas it argues that leaders, consciously or unconsciously, demonstrate different behaviors toward different members of their work groups (Graen et al, 1972;Orris & Johnson, 1973;in van Breukelen et al, 2006). While they establish a high-quality relationship through building a sense of mutual trust, respect and loyalty with some followers (in-group), their interactions with other followers is limited within the formal contacts (out-group).…”
Section: Leader Member Exchange (Lmx)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation