1991
DOI: 10.1016/s0082-0784(06)80358-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An experimental and theoretical study of porous radiant burner performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sathe et ai. [3] reported a maximum radiant efficiency of 40 9% for these burners, however, our observation that leaner mixtures produced higher efficiencies is consistent with their work. The 21% excess radiant output measured by the FTIR was in large part attributed to the fact that the emission gases such as COz and water also radiate heat to the FTIR.…”
Section: Results and Mcussroivsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Sathe et ai. [3] reported a maximum radiant efficiency of 40 9% for these burners, however, our observation that leaner mixtures produced higher efficiencies is consistent with their work. The 21% excess radiant output measured by the FTIR was in large part attributed to the fact that the emission gases such as COz and water also radiate heat to the FTIR.…”
Section: Results and Mcussroivsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…P 3 The ratio of convection between two phases to solid radiation, hAL x =T 3 g0 P 4 The ratio of combustion heat to solid radiation, L x _ Q=T 4 g0 P 5 The ratio of solid conduction to solid radiation, k p =T 3 g0 L x P 6 The ratio of gas convection to gas conduction at boundaries, h wg L x =k p P 7 The …”
Section: Nomenclaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last decades, many numerical studies and experimental investigations have been done on the combustion of porous media [1][2][3][4][5][6]. In order to optimize the combustion process, Brenner et al [7] studied a 2-D pseudo homogeneous porous burner in 2000.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). [4] The burner can be conveniently subdivided into three parts, namely the entrance zone, the porous combustion support, and the oxit zone. First, the gas combustible is injected in the porous support from the upstream (or entrance) zone while the burner ignition is performed at the porous support boundary in downstream (or exit) zone.…”
Section: Basic Physical Phenomenamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tables 1 and 2 summarize the effective properties involved in the above numerical model (i.e., in Eqs. [1][2][3][4][5][6] and their relationship with the constitutive material and architecture. [11][12][13][14][15][16][17] The current numerical model is constituted of 36 coupled equations (27 equations for species transport according to the famous Mech 1 chemistry mechanisms; [18] 3 equations for energy transfer and gas phase velocity (i.e., Eqs.…”
Section: Continuity Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%