An experimental comparison of checklist-based reading and perspective-based reading for UML design document inspection

Sabaliauskaite, Giedre; Matsukawa, Fumikazu; Kusumoto, Shoichi; Inoue, Katsuro

doi:10.1109/isese.2002.1166934

Cited by 19 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In Ref. [25,26] we have reported on experiment on inspection of UML diagrams. During the experiment, we compared the performance of individual inspectors and simulated teams using PBR vs. those using CBR.…”

Section: Empirical Investigation Of Cbr and Pbrmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessing defect detection performance of interacting teams in object-oriented design inspection

Sabaliauskaite

Kusumoto

Inoue

2004

Information and Software Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Empirical Investigation Of Cbr and Pbrmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessing defect detection performance of interacting teams in object-oriented design inspection

Sabaliauskaite

Kusumoto

Inoue

2004

Information and Software Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Another study conducted by Sabaliauskaite et al (2004) also compared the CBR and PBR techniques, but in a different context from their previous study (Sabaliauskaite et al, 2002a). It presents an evaluation of inspected UML documents design.…”

Section: Research Question 2 (Rq2a and Rq2b)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Thus, such common defect types existing in the literature occurs in the studies of Brykczynski (1999;Biffl and Halling, 2000;Laitenberger et al, 2001;Sabaliauskaite et al, 2002a;2004;Thelin et al, 2003;Denger and Paech, 2004;Cox et al, 2004a;Staron et al, 2005;Mohammed et al, 2015). A brief discussion of each study of such techniques/approaches is presented as follows:…”

Section: Research Question 2 (Rq2a and Rq2b)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In summary, the studies presented in this section answered RQ2 and provide evidence of the existing inspection techniques or approaches associated with defect types, encompassing studies, such as: (i) several academic validation studies that compare and evaluate the effectiveness of the main inspection techniques (e.g., CBR, PBR, SBR, Ad hoc, among others) in distinct contexts (Biffl and Halling, 2000;Cox et al 2004a;Denger and Paech, 2004;Laitenberger et al, 2001;Mohammed et al, 2015;Sabaliauskaite et al, 2002a;2003;Staron et al, 2005;Thelin et al, 2003); (ii) case studies in industry (Felderer et al, 2014;Ma et al, 2014; and (iii) application and adaptation of systematic classifications such as ODC (Gopinath et al, 2014;Ma et al 2014;.…”

Section: Research Question 2 (Rq2a and Rq2b)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In addition, it achieved lower costs for identifying defects based on the effort of the subjects. Sabaliauskaite et al (2002a) evaluated the performance of two inspection groups throughout experiments using two reading techniques: CBR and PBR. In this scenario, obtained results from comparing these techniques reveal no significant differences between them.…”

Section: Research Question 2 (Rq2a and Rq2b)mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Defect Types and Software Inspection Techniques: A Systematic Mapping Study

OliveiraJr¹,

Geraldi²

2017

Journal of Computer Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Software inspection has been used to guarantee and control the quality of products by detecting defects, which can be spread out throughout the entire software life cycle. Therefore, the main premise is to identify and reduce the number of defect types in software artifacts during inspections. This work focuses on providing an up to dated overview of existing defects in the context of software inspection techniques. A systematic mapping was carried out, from which 2096 primary studies were retrieved and 32 were final selected. From the analysis, classification and aggregation of the retrieved studies, important different defect types were identified. Most studies encompass defect types by means of experiments and proposed techniques and approaches. Thus, as a main result, the identification of several different studies with distinct proposals concerned on defect types is evident. Although researchers have conducted studies over time, a general pattern on the detection of defects could not be established. Therefore, the scenario in which this study was carried out provides researchers with the capability of conducting further research in a motivating and challenging research topic, as well as practitioners with the adoption of empirically evaluated inspection techniques and respective defect types.

show abstract

Empirical evidence about the UML: a systematic literature review

et al. 2010

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Unified Modeling Language (UML) was created on the basis of expert opinion and has now become accepted as the ‘standard’ object‐oriented modelling notation. Our objectives were to determine how widely the notations of the UML, and their usefulness, have been studied empirically, and to identify which aspects of it have been studied in most detail. We undertook a mapping study of the literature to identify relevant empirical studies and to classify them in terms of the aspects of the UML that they studied. We then conducted a systematic literature review, covering empirical studies published up to the end of 2008, based on the main categories identified. We identified 49 relevant publications, and report the aggregated results for those categories for which we had enough papers— metrics, comprehension, model quality, methods and tools and adoption. Despite indications that a number of problems exist with UML models, researchers tend to use the UML as a ‘given’ and seem reluctant to ask questions that might help to make it more effective. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

show abstract

An experimental comparison of checklist-based reading and perspective-based reading for UML design document inspection

Abstract: Abstract

Cited by 19 publications

References 20 publications

Assessing defect detection performance of interacting teams in object-oriented design inspection

Assessing defect detection performance of interacting teams in object-oriented design inspection

Defect Types and Software Inspection Techniques: A Systematic Mapping Study

Empirical evidence about the UML: a systematic literature review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About