2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11252-017-0654-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An experimental evaluation of foraging decisions in urban and natural forest populations of Anolis lizards

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it was hypothesized that urban lizards should take more risks and act less neophobic during foraging compared to rural conspecifics, but no significant differences in behaviour were found between urban and rural lizards. The few previous studies on boldness and risk‐taking in urban lizards have yielded mixed results (Chejanovski et al., ; Lapiedra et al., ; Moule et al., ; Pellitteri‐Rosa et al., ). Most studies on birds and mammals, however, seem to confirm that urban animals are indeed bolder (Charmantier, Demeyrier, Lambrechts, Perret, & Grégoire, ; Evans et al., ; Lowry et al., ; Miranda et al., ; but see Seress, Bókony, Heszberger, & Liker, ; Valcarcel & Fernández‐Juricic, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, it was hypothesized that urban lizards should take more risks and act less neophobic during foraging compared to rural conspecifics, but no significant differences in behaviour were found between urban and rural lizards. The few previous studies on boldness and risk‐taking in urban lizards have yielded mixed results (Chejanovski et al., ; Lapiedra et al., ; Moule et al., ; Pellitteri‐Rosa et al., ). Most studies on birds and mammals, however, seem to confirm that urban animals are indeed bolder (Charmantier, Demeyrier, Lambrechts, Perret, & Grégoire, ; Evans et al., ; Lowry et al., ; Miranda et al., ; but see Seress, Bókony, Heszberger, & Liker, ; Valcarcel & Fernández‐Juricic, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, some species have adapted to life in the city and now thrive in urban environments, although requiring specific behavioural adjustments (Audet, Ducatez, & Lefebvre, ; Lowry, Lill, & Wong, ; Sol et al., ). Similar to islands, it has been suggested that predation pressure in urban areas is low, as many of the normal predators will either be absent (Candler & Bernal, ; Faeth et al., ; Sol et al., ; Valcarcel & Fernández‐Juricic, ) or will have shifted to anthropogenic food sources (Chejanovski, Avilés‐Rodríguez, Lapiedra, Preisser, & Kolbe, ). Urban animals can therefore afford being bolder, which has been demonstrated in species of various taxa (see Miranda et al., for a review).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is important to note that while costs of thermoregulation may be lower in urban sites, Basson, Levy, Angilletta, and Clusella‐Trullas () showed that even in a low‐quality thermal habitat with high thermoregulatory costs in the laboratory, Cordylus lizards prioritized maintaining T b within T pref . It may be necessary to maintain warmer body temperatures that confer higher activity in urban habitats in the Miami area, even if costly, to successfully compete with multiple other introduced and native anoles (Kolbe et al, ), or manage urban predation pressure (Chejanovski, Avilés‐Rodríguez, Lapiedra, Preisser, & Kolbe, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, native reptiles might be particularly resistant to human land use. For instance, urban anole populations can even develop a better body condition than conspecific forest populations (Chejanovski, Avilés‐Rodríguez, Lapiedra, Preisser, & Kolbe, ). However, given the highly significant positive association of native abundances with forest habitat, forest‐living likely presents optimal conditions for native species, and it is deforestation that reduces population numbers rather than purely the addition of man‐made substrates (Shochat et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%