2021
DOI: 10.1007/s12525-021-00473-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An experimental examination of credible information disclosure, perception of fairness, and intention to do business in online multi-bilateral negotiations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is despite the clear economic incentive structure and the risk of potentially losing the chance to reach a good deal in a parallel negotiation by spending so much time. Nevertheless, we confirm that the revelation of trusted and accurate information, even if this does not occur via the negotiator themselves as in previous research (Citera et al 2005 ; Yu et al 2021 ) but through a third, independent party, increases fact-related honesty and reliability of negotiation conversations. We claim that those findings hold for peer-to-peer negotiations in typical high-value transactions like in the used car market (Paese et al 2003 ; Hofstede et al 2019 ) or for example also in the real estate market (Galinsky et al 2016 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is despite the clear economic incentive structure and the risk of potentially losing the chance to reach a good deal in a parallel negotiation by spending so much time. Nevertheless, we confirm that the revelation of trusted and accurate information, even if this does not occur via the negotiator themselves as in previous research (Citera et al 2005 ; Yu et al 2021 ) but through a third, independent party, increases fact-related honesty and reliability of negotiation conversations. We claim that those findings hold for peer-to-peer negotiations in typical high-value transactions like in the used car market (Paese et al 2003 ; Hofstede et al 2019 ) or for example also in the real estate market (Galinsky et al 2016 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This is different if the authenticated data is delivered directly during the negotiation by an intermediary or a platform trusted by both participants. The role of the authenticated data increases even further if the disclosed information is based on facts and is revealed appropriately, accurately, and is unbiased, so participants can trust and rely on it (Yu et al 2021 ). These characteristics enable the availability of more correct information with source credibility that increases information adoption, information usefulness, and information credibility (Ismagilova et al 2020 ), especially if available in a low-complex, predefined, and structured manner.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Titled "An experimental examination of credible information disclosure, perception of fairness, and intention to do business in online multi-bilateral negotiations" the authors Bo Yu, Gregory E. Kersten and Rustam Vahidov investigate the role of negotiations on the intention to do business. In their experiment of an inter-organizational procurement case they find that perceived fairness in the conduct of negotiations and the disclosure of best offer information is critical for repeated transactions within a business relationship (Yu et al, 2022).…”
Section: Articles Of Present Issuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Agndal et al (2017) found that about 60% of the 490 studies in their review, spanning 1995–2015, used students as respondents and about 60% of the studies were experimental simulations, with only about a third involving real managers. Current research focusing on business-to-business negotiations that involve multiple parties still tends to fall into this tradition of experimental role-plays, such as Geiger et al (2022) and Yu et al (2022). We provide an empirical example of how data on network relationships and negotiation behavior can be collected and analyzed in real-world business networks, and we undertake the uncommon task of providing an example of “alternative methodological approaches” that “may help the field develop in new directions” (Agndal et al , 2017, p. 495).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%