1993
DOI: 10.1002/jps.2600821001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Experimental Method for Determining the Hildebrand Solubility Parameter of Organic Nonelectrolytes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…b Experimental data taken from Beerbower et al (1984). c Experimental data taken from Lin and Nash (1993). solubility order is noted in the two butanol solvents. Measured solubilities in the alcohol solvents do fall within a narrow mole fraction range, particularly if 2-methyl-1-propanol is excluded.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…b Experimental data taken from Beerbower et al (1984). c Experimental data taken from Lin and Nash (1993). solubility order is noted in the two butanol solvents. Measured solubilities in the alcohol solvents do fall within a narrow mole fraction range, particularly if 2-methyl-1-propanol is excluded.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of Hildebrand solubility of PMMA and PS are 9.3 cal 1/2 and 9.1 cal 1/2 cm -3/2 . Hildebrand solubility values approaching solvent PS and PMMA is ethyl acetate (9.1 cal 1/2 cm -3/2 ) [15][16][17][18]. Solubility process is controlled by the solubility of the polymer chain tangling or by diffusion through the boundary layer adjacent to the polymer-solvent interface [19].…”
Section: Design Of Indicator Strip From Polymers By Specific Chemicalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relationships of Drug Solubility Parameter and Cosolvent Action The experimental solubility parameter of a drug d 2 can be determined from the Lin and Nash method, 25) using the solubility mole fraction of the drug X 2i in three or five pure solvents of known solubility parameters d 1i : Water, ethanol and ethyl acetate were used here ( Table 5). The values of d 2 calculated from the Fedors group contribution method 26) are higher (Table 5) and nearer the solubility peak found in the more polar mixture (ethanol-water).…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 8 shows a sample of the solubility profiles predicted at b) Experimental value from the Lin and Nash method. 25) c) No peak in ethanol-water. 25°C for MTZ, and MBZ and TBZ.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%