1969
DOI: 10.1016/s0016-3287(69)80025-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An experimental study of group opinion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
1,091
0
81

Year Published

1999
1999
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,188 publications
(1,174 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
1,091
0
81
Order By: Relevance
“…The Delphi method is a consensus technique that collects expert opinions through several rounds of surveys or interviews, and is characterized by anonymity, iteration, controlled feedback, and statistical group response (expression of the degree of consensus within a group). [22][23][24] For the first round, we requested that each Delphi participant indicate the top five to ten barriers from among all the barriers identified in the content analysis. For the second round, we presented each participant with the sum total of anonymous votes for all barriers from the first round, and requested that each participant again indicate the top five to ten barriers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Delphi method is a consensus technique that collects expert opinions through several rounds of surveys or interviews, and is characterized by anonymity, iteration, controlled feedback, and statistical group response (expression of the degree of consensus within a group). [22][23][24] For the first round, we requested that each Delphi participant indicate the top five to ten barriers from among all the barriers identified in the content analysis. For the second round, we presented each participant with the sum total of anonymous votes for all barriers from the first round, and requested that each participant again indicate the top five to ten barriers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to a linguistically accurate translation of the CAPS-5 that would correspond to the official Dutch translation of the DSM-5 ensuring content validity, it was deemed important to create a translation that would optimally fit into clinical and research practice. This led to the development and realization of a novel stepped crowd-translation process to engender the Dutch CAPS-5, which involved a crowd of Dutch psychotrauma professionals (clinicians as well as researchers) and was based on the principles of a cross-cultural adaptation process (Beaton et al, 2000) as well as the Delphi method (Dalkey, 1969; Dalkey & Helmer, 1963; Hsu & Sandford, 2007) for consensus-building by expert-rounds. This process encompassed six translation steps that were carried out to develop the Dutch version of the CAPS-5 (Figure 1).…”
Section: Development Of the Dutch Caps-5mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper describes an innovative approach of translation to ensure cross-cultural validity of diagnostic instruments using a combination of principles of a cross-cultural adaptation process (Beaton et al, 2000) and the Delphi method (Dalkey, 1969; Dalkey & Helmer, 1963; Hsu & Sandford, 2007). By involving multiple experts in different rounds the employed approach of translation was instrumental in achieving an instrument that was broadly supported among experts.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three methods were used to estimate the population: an indirect approach, 12 a representative population survey, 13 and a modified Delphi technique. [14][15][16] The utility of each method is discussed and the estimates are triangulated to provide a single estimate of YBMSM living on the SSC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%