2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10690-009-9080-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Explicit Finite Difference Approach to the Pricing Problems of Perpetual Bermudan Options

Abstract: Perpetual Bermudan options, Optimal stopping problems, Explicit finite difference methods, Linear complementarity problem, PSOR algorithm, Linear programming methods, Interior point methods,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Before showing the numerical results, we would like to emphasis that the ultimate goal of this paper is to price PBOs under the LJDR process. The parameters of option contracts examined in Table 1 are adapted from Table 2 of Ju (1998) and Table 4 of Muroi and Yamada (2008). Therefore, the accuracy and efficiency of our method can be clearly discerned when comparing with those PD-process-based methods.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Before showing the numerical results, we would like to emphasis that the ultimate goal of this paper is to price PBOs under the LJDR process. The parameters of option contracts examined in Table 1 are adapted from Table 2 of Ju (1998) and Table 4 of Muroi and Yamada (2008). Therefore, the accuracy and efficiency of our method can be clearly discerned when comparing with those PD-process-based methods.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this setting, we calculate values of 500-year Bermudan options when Δt equals 0.0001, 0.00005, and 0.00001. The parameters of option contracts examined in Table 1 are adapted from Table 2 of Ju (1998) and Table 4 of Muroi and Yamada (2008). In addition, we consider the time interval between two exercisable time points, τ, to be 0.004 (daily), 0.02 (weekly), 0.083 (monthly), 0.25 (quarterly), 0.5 (semiannually), and 1 (annually).…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations