2019
DOI: 10.1089/jamp.2019.1531
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Exploration of Factors Affecting In Vitro Deposition of Pharmaceutical Aerosols in the Alberta Idealized Throat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides, the internal geometry was more complex than artificial throat in real human body and moist mucus layers also existed, which might lead to more particle deposition without bouncing back. Thus, the Alberta throat 50 with more detailed internal geometry and 1% Tween® 80 9 could be applied in the future study for acquiring more realistic correlation between in vitro simulation and in vivo .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, the internal geometry was more complex than artificial throat in real human body and moist mucus layers also existed, which might lead to more particle deposition without bouncing back. Thus, the Alberta throat 50 with more detailed internal geometry and 1% Tween® 80 9 could be applied in the future study for acquiring more realistic correlation between in vitro simulation and in vivo .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To summarize the limitations discussed above: (1) differences in inhaler brands, (2) comparisons were based on the percentage of particles in the 1-5-mm range and not the total number of particles in this size range, (3) the nonspherical shape of the inhaler's albuterol particles, and (4) the use of the Ventolin brand inhaler, which might be different from other albuterol inhaler brands. Other studies have examined additional clinical factors that affect respiratory drug deposition, such as humidity 11,12 and insertion angle of the inhaler, 11 thus, there are numerous other factors that affect inhaler performance and clinical response that were not tested in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If differences in TLD are to be relied upon, it is preferred that these measurements come from in vivo clinical studies (i.e., imaging or charcoal block pharmacokinetics methods). Alternatively anatomical throat models (e.g., the Alberta Idealized Throat, AIT), particularly when using realistic inspiratory flow profiles, have demonstrated good in vitro/in vivo correlations (Zhang et al, 2007;Byron et al, 2010;Delvadia et al, 2012;Olsson et al, 2013;Finlay and Martin, 2015;Weers et al, 2015;Ruzycki et al, 2019;Newman and Chan, 2020;Ruzycki et al, 2020). The last choice for estimates of TLD should be cascade impactors.…”
Section: Minimum Threshold Energymentioning
confidence: 99%