2014
DOI: 10.26634/jelt.4.1.2639
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Exploratory Investigation Of Online Forum Mediated Collaborative Learning Of Speech Writing: A Case Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of Blackboard LMS helped the students to put into practice the learning experience. The result is consistent with [12] where integration of LMS such as Moodle is found to give the students an additional platform to practice, collaborate and discuss speech writing. Out of many teaching-learning facilities available on LMS, the student chose online forum as a tool for giving additional practice in speech writing.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The use of Blackboard LMS helped the students to put into practice the learning experience. The result is consistent with [12] where integration of LMS such as Moodle is found to give the students an additional platform to practice, collaborate and discuss speech writing. Out of many teaching-learning facilities available on LMS, the student chose online forum as a tool for giving additional practice in speech writing.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In [12] Lata and Luhach, conducted a case study exploring the integration of LMS Nalanda created on Moodle in Effective Public Speaking (EPS) classroom to give students an additional platform to practice, collaborate and discuss speech writing. Out of many teaching and learning facilities available on LMS, the researcher chose online forum as a tool for giving additional practice in speech writing.…”
Section: A Lms and Higher Education Students Achievementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As indicated in Figure 1, there were 11 papers in this review that did not meet the criteria for inclusion as case studies. One of the most important reasons for rejecting a study was the lack of a clearly laid out methodology section as was the case with the studies by Cantabella et al (2019), Lata and Luhach (2014), Segrelles et al (2017), Pa ľová et al (2018), and Company et al (2017. The study on online role play by postgraduate students was considered not to meet the criteria of a case study because it was not a study of actual phenomena but rather a description of a controlled event (Beckmann & Mahanty, 2016).…”
Section: Non-case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%