2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2020.123875
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An extension of Berwald's inequality and its relation to Zhang's inequality

Abstract: In this note prove the following Berwald-type inequality, showing that for any integrable log-concave function f : R n → [0, ∞) and any concave function h :, extending the range of p where the monotonicity is known to hold true.As an application of this extension, we will provide a new proof of a functional form of Zhang's reverse Petty projection inequality, recently obtained in [ABG].

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In convex geometry, the Brunn-Minkowski theory (and its extensions) for convex bodies encompasses a large and growing range of fundamental results on the algebraic and geometric properties of convex bodies, and hence to study the parallel algebraic and geometric properties of log-concave functions is of great significance and in great demand. Recent years have witnessed that many results and notions in the Brunn-Minkowski theory (and its extensions) for convex bodies have found their functional analogues, including but not limited to the functional Blaschke-Santaló type inequality and its inverse [8,11,13,14,33,34,42], (John, Lutwak-Yang-Zhang, and Löwner) ellipsoids for log-concave functions [6,31,45], Rogers-Shephard type inequality and its reverse for log-concave functions [1,2,5,26], the affine surface areas for log-concave functions [9,20,21,22,23,44], the variation and Minkowski type problems related to log-concave functions [28,29,41,59], and (isoperimetric) inequalities related to log-concave functions [3,4,7,16,19,46,58]. Other contributions include e.g., [10,12,51] among others.…”
Section: Introduction and Overview Of The Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In convex geometry, the Brunn-Minkowski theory (and its extensions) for convex bodies encompasses a large and growing range of fundamental results on the algebraic and geometric properties of convex bodies, and hence to study the parallel algebraic and geometric properties of log-concave functions is of great significance and in great demand. Recent years have witnessed that many results and notions in the Brunn-Minkowski theory (and its extensions) for convex bodies have found their functional analogues, including but not limited to the functional Blaschke-Santaló type inequality and its inverse [8,11,13,14,33,34,42], (John, Lutwak-Yang-Zhang, and Löwner) ellipsoids for log-concave functions [6,31,45], Rogers-Shephard type inequality and its reverse for log-concave functions [1,2,5,26], the affine surface areas for log-concave functions [9,20,21,22,23,44], the variation and Minkowski type problems related to log-concave functions [28,29,41,59], and (isoperimetric) inequalities related to log-concave functions [3,4,7,16,19,46,58]. Other contributions include e.g., [10,12,51] among others.…”
Section: Introduction and Overview Of The Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A classical result due to Berwald [11] (see also [4,5] for other extensions and considerations), from which the Rogers-Shephard inequalities (1.2) and (1.9) can be derived, relates certain weighted power means of a concave function, as follows:…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following result can be seen as a degenerate version of Lemma 2.1 and its proof can be found in [2, Lemma 2.1]. In this case, we can characterise the equality cases.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Functional versions of the above for functions in F(double-struckRn), the set of integrable log‐concave functions on Rn, was proved in [1, Lemma 3.3] for the range γ>0, and was extended to the range γ>1 in [2, Theorem 1.1]. Lemma Let fF(double-struckRn) and let C be the convex set C={false(x,tfalse)double-struckRn×false[0,false):ffalse(xfalse)etffalse∥}.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%