2022
DOI: 10.1039/d2cp03051a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An ab initio study of the rovibronic spectrum of sulphur monoxide (SO): diabatic vs. adiabatic representation

Abstract: e present an ab initio study of the rovibronic spectra of sulphur monoxide using internally contracted multireference configuration interaction (ic-MRCI) method using aug-cc-pV5Z basis sets. It covers 13 lowest electronic...

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We find some weak-to-moderate (2.5 σ ) evidence of SO (ref. 82 ) and no evidence of SO 3 (ref. 83 ), qualitatively matching the photochemical model predictions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We find some weak-to-moderate (2.5 σ ) evidence of SO (ref. 82 ) and no evidence of SO 3 (ref. 83 ), qualitatively matching the photochemical model predictions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its curves have complex shapes with the model being very sensitive to the mutual consistency of the curves V 1 a , V 2 a , and W 12 (1) around the crossing point. The disadvantage of the diabatic representation is that it does not come out as a solution of the (adiabatic) electronic structure calculations directly and needs to be constructed either through a diabatization approach ,, or approximated.…”
Section: Solving the Rovibronic Schrödinger Equations For Ch And Yomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The so-called derivative couplings (DDRs) or nonadiabatic couplings (NACs) between states that exhibit avoided crossings arise through the nuclear kinetic energy operator acting on the electronic wave functions when the BO approximation is relaxed and corresponds to derivatives in terms of the nuclear coordinate. The computation of DDRs and PESs around the avoided crossing geometry is a major source of computational expense within both quantum chemistry and nuclear motion calculations because of the cusp-like behavior of the PESs and the singular nature of the DDRs at the geometry of spatial degeneracy. , It is therefore the main focus of many works to explore property-based diabatization methods , that transform to a diabatic representation, where DDRs vanish or are reduced and PESs become smooth. For diatomics, the smoothness condition of their PECs uniquely defines the unitary transformation to the diabatic representation where NACs (first-order nondiagonal DDR) vanish, PECs are allowed to cross, and consequently, the molecular properties are smooth, at the cost of introducing off-diagonal diabatic potential couplings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In principle, either the adiabatic or diabatic representation can be used to describe the PECs with avoided crossing. However, the adiabatic PECs have singularities near the crossing points [62], leading to lower fitting accuracy of the PECs and less numerical robustness in collision integral calculations. Moreover, based on the Landau-Zener method [63], an earlier calculation for nitrogen showed that the diabatic paths in collisions are much more likely to be followed than the adiabatic paths through the avoided crossing [58].…”
Section: Ab Initio Calculations Of Pecsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where the superscripts d and a refer to the diabatic and adiabatic bases, respectively, and θ is the nonadiabatic mixing angle which can be calculated by integrating the nonadiabatic coupling terms (NACTs) ⟨Ψ ad i |∂/∂R|Ψ ad j ⟩ or the CI vector method [62,65,66]. In this work, the CI vectors method is used for the avoided crossings due to the two-state coupling.…”
Section: Ab Initio Calculations Of Pecsmentioning
confidence: 99%