2018
DOI: 10.1007/s40192-018-0111-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An ICME Process Chain for Diffusion Brazing of Alloy 247

Abstract: A virtual process chain for diffusion brazing of Ni-based superalloys is presented for the example of Alloy 247. Besides phasefield simulation of different brazing processes, the chain includes solidification with equiaxed and columnar microstructures, heat treatment processes, and annealing and rafting of γ'-precipitates in 3D, as well as conversion of the resulting microstructures into finite element meshes for further evaluation of their properties by FE approaches. The challenges of setting-up a seamless s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These are of high importance in multicomponent high-alloyed systems like Ni-base superalloys and describe partial dissipation of elastic energy by stress-driven diffusion, generally leading to a reduction of the stress levels. The applicability of MICRESS® for scale-bridging and for simulation of process chains in ICME contexts has been recently demonstrated [38]. For the simulations, a difference in molar volume was assumed between the and ′ phases, leading to a lattice parameter misfit of ≈ 0.17% , which is in good agreement with the experimentally determined value [37].…”
Section: Phase-field Simulation Of Microstructure Formationsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These are of high importance in multicomponent high-alloyed systems like Ni-base superalloys and describe partial dissipation of elastic energy by stress-driven diffusion, generally leading to a reduction of the stress levels. The applicability of MICRESS® for scale-bridging and for simulation of process chains in ICME contexts has been recently demonstrated [38]. For the simulations, a difference in molar volume was assumed between the and ′ phases, leading to a lattice parameter misfit of ≈ 0.17% , which is in good agreement with the experimentally determined value [37].…”
Section: Phase-field Simulation Of Microstructure Formationsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Phase-field simulations of microstructure evolution in general are frequently employed for the description and optimization of the physical and mechanical material behavior at mesoscale [32]. With respect to the present context, we mention the successful simulation application to the solidification of Ni-base superalloys [33][34][35] as well as to microstructure evolution during heat treatment [36][37][38]. Phase-field simulations operate with explicit microstructures, based on a diffuse interface description.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second simulation step was performed using the results of the first simulation as initial microstructure. Reading of the structure was achieved without information loss by a technique using the restart output (.rest) of the former simulation [21,22]. The initial microstructure was shifted in negative z-direction according to the thickness of 40 µm of the new layer.…”
Section: Model Parameters and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leon et al [33] used subset selection and active subspace techniques to identify dominant parameters in a continuum phase-field poly-domain model for ferroelectric materials. These earlier approaches focused on UQ/UP over a single modeling framework, but Böttger [34] recently demonstrated the propagation of uncertainty across an entire ICME-based model chain. Across different fields [35], UP is practically implemented through many different approaches, including Monte-Carlo-, local expansion-,functional expansion-, and numerical integrationbased methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%