2012 International Conference on Informatics, Electronics &Amp; Vision (ICIEV) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/iciev.2012.6317458
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An image watermarking approach based on Set Partitioning in Hierarchical Trees(SPIHT)algorithm

Abstract: In recent times, digital watermarking has become one of the advanced technologies to protect images from illicit manipulations. A non-blind robust Discrete Wavelet Transform domain watermarking approach for images is introduced in this paper. Based on the parent-child relationship between wavelet coefficients, the Set Partitioning in Hierarchical Trees (SPIHT) algorithm is applied on the transformed host image to find out the significant coefficients for embedding binary patterned watermark image. Higher level… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The comparative results are given only for the standard images like Pirate or Lena. Table 10 shows that the proposed method achieves almost similar result or better in some cases even though the scheme proposed in [37] is a non-blind scheme and our proposed scheme is a blind scheme. Comparison of results according to correlation coefficient (C) with the blind scheme proposed in [38] is listed in table 11.…”
Section: Comparison To Existing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The comparative results are given only for the standard images like Pirate or Lena. Table 10 shows that the proposed method achieves almost similar result or better in some cases even though the scheme proposed in [37] is a non-blind scheme and our proposed scheme is a blind scheme. Comparison of results according to correlation coefficient (C) with the blind scheme proposed in [38] is listed in table 11.…”
Section: Comparison To Existing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The proposed algorithm is compared to a non-blind scheme presented in [37] and a blind scheme presented in [38]. The comparison results are summarized in tables 10 and 11.…”
Section: Comparison To Existing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to improve the invisibility of watermark, edge points which have complex texture will be selected as the embedding location of watermark. So a noise visibility function [5] was introduced. The noise visibility function (NVF) can reflect the shelter ability of texture of the local image, and it can measure each pixel's sensitivity to noise .The NVF range from zero to one.…”
Section: The Introduction Of Basic Knowledge Involvedmentioning
confidence: 99%