2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2019.108884
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An immersed boundary method for fluid-structure interaction based on variational transfer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To this end, we designed a computational model of a BHV in an anatomically correct model of an AR. The governing equations were solved with a FSI solver (Nestola et al, 2019) which comprises a finite-element structural solver for soft tissue and a high-order Navier-Stokes solver that has been designed for the study of laminar-turbulent transition (e.g., Obrist et al, 2012;John et al, 2016). The FSI solver was verified and validated for canonical benchmarks in Nestola et al (2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, we designed a computational model of a BHV in an anatomically correct model of an AR. The governing equations were solved with a FSI solver (Nestola et al, 2019) which comprises a finite-element structural solver for soft tissue and a high-order Navier-Stokes solver that has been designed for the study of laminar-turbulent transition (e.g., Obrist et al, 2012;John et al, 2016). The FSI solver was verified and validated for canonical benchmarks in Nestola et al (2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use an adapted immersed boundary approach following [16,30,29,32]. In our approach, the FSI problem is solved separately for the fluid and the solid in a fixed point iteration using finite elements.…”
Section: Methods and Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mappings between the domains are realized as volumetric variational transfer operators explained in subsection 2.4. Note, that while we employ the same principles as [16], [30] or [29], our adaption differs from these methods, as we do not use Lagrange multipliers, but a penalty method to enforce the equality of solid and fluid velocities. We denote the fluid domain with Ω f ⊂ R 3 , the moving solid domain depending on time t with Ω t s ⊂ Ω f , the boundary of the fluid domain with Γ f and the boundary of the solid domain with Γ t s .…”
Section: Methods and Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…FD methods are also flexible in as much as they enable different formulations of the solid and the fluid problem. This is demonstrated in this article, where we have extended the approach in [41,49,67] to include a mortar-based contact method [66] in the solid problem and an augmented Lagrangian method for the coupling in the fluid problem. We formulate the solid problem with linear elasticity and linearized contact conditions, whereas for the fluid problem we use the incompressible Navier Stokes equations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%