2018 7th IEEE International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (Biorob) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/biorob.2018.8487225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Impedance Control of Human Ankle Joint Using Functional Electrical Stimulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The AMCA (16) indicates that the dorsi/plantarflexor torques (τ d and τ p ) can be determined by the control input τ c and the given desired intrinsic stiffness K c , as represented by the blue dots in Fig. 3.…”
Section: B Antagonistic Muscle Co-contraction Allocatormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The AMCA (16) indicates that the dorsi/plantarflexor torques (τ d and τ p ) can be determined by the control input τ c and the given desired intrinsic stiffness K c , as represented by the blue dots in Fig. 3.…”
Section: B Antagonistic Muscle Co-contraction Allocatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This stiffness control, which cannot stabilize the joint motion by itself, could result in unstable behavior: falling due to failure in standing balance. Recently, our research group has attempted to control the impedance of ankle joint using FES [16], but our approach has the following limitations; 1) dorsiflexor was only used to control, 2) the result showed inadequate control performance (significant impedance error), and 3) it was only tested in an unloading situation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14,15 Kirsch et al 15 applied feedback control techniques which usually eliminated tracking error by increasing stimulation amplitude or frequency. Kim and Kim 16 applied an impedance control to the ankle joint to show adjustability of the ankle joint impedance through the FES application. Due to nonlinear dynamics of the musculoskeletal system, 17 several nonlinear identification 18 and control strategies have been used for the FES therapy including compensated feedback, 19 sliding mode control, 20 and nonlinear model predictive control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interaction between humans and robots is a challenge in the field of robotic rehabilitation, since such interaction should ensure the safety of the patient, meet the therapy requirements for each specific subject and satisfy the assist-as-needed paradigm, predicting the intention of movement of the user. Several interaction controls have been studied in order to reduce the risks and ensure the treatment efficacy: EMG-driven adaptive impedance control [Peña 2017], control strategy based on kinetic motor primitives [Nunes et al 2018], performance-based adaptive assistance controller [Bayon et al 2018], motor intention decoding algorithm [Pastore et al 2018], Markovian robust compliance control [Jutinico et al 2018], impedance control using functional electrical stimulation [Kim and Kim 2018].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%