2021
DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2021.716597
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Implementation of Patient-Specific Biventricular Mechanics Simulations With a Deep Learning and Computational Pipeline

Abstract: Parameterised patient-specific models of the heart enable quantitative analysis of cardiac function as well as estimation of regional stress and intrinsic tissue stiffness. However, the development of personalised models and subsequent simulations have often required lengthy manual setup, from image labelling through to generating the finite element model and assigning boundary conditions. Recently, rapid patient-specific finite element modelling has been made possible through the use of machine learning techn… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An alternative, would be a lumped-parameter model, however, resulting in an idealized pressure trace not directly representing the measured pressure. Another data-driven alternative would be to incorporate the active parameter as Lagrange multipliers in the model implementation, while including both, pressure and volume measurements as model inputs ( Asner et al, 2016 ; Miller et al, 2021 ). This option is, however, not part of the Living Heart Human model.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative, would be a lumped-parameter model, however, resulting in an idealized pressure trace not directly representing the measured pressure. Another data-driven alternative would be to incorporate the active parameter as Lagrange multipliers in the model implementation, while including both, pressure and volume measurements as model inputs ( Asner et al, 2016 ; Miller et al, 2021 ). This option is, however, not part of the Living Heart Human model.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fast and accurate predictions made by the deep learning model have been used in diverse elds of studies of cardiovascular mechanics (Dabiri et al 2020;Galati et al 2022; Kadem et al 2022;Liang et al 2018;Madani et al 2019). Moreover, emerging advancements in medical imaging techniques and computational modeling methods enable the generation of patientspeci c computational ventricular models (Litjens et al 2019;Miller et al 2021;Romaszko et al 2021; Tang et al 2010). As a result, the development of deep learning models in conjunction with constitutive analysis represents a feasible opportunity for conducting further clinical studies using non-invasive procedures in realistic patient-speci c settings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over recent decades, the use of patient-specific numerical models has continued to grow for an increasing range of applications [1][2][3]. Recent technological advances in medical imaging and computational power have enabled the increased use of numerical patient-specific modeling, providing a reliable tool for the study of cardiovascular problems in a highly accurate way.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%