2013
DOI: 10.16943/ptinsa/2013/v79i4/47987
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Implicit Erosion Algorithm for the Numerical Simulation of Metallic and Composite Materials Submitted to High Strain Rates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8. Four simulations are realized with = [2,4,6,8] (layers) to determine the distance at which the remeshing does not significantly influence the results, the temperature curves are given at the substrate and deposit thermocouple in Fig. 9.…”
Section: Remeshing Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…8. Four simulations are realized with = [2,4,6,8] (layers) to determine the distance at which the remeshing does not significantly influence the results, the temperature curves are given at the substrate and deposit thermocouple in Fig. 9.…”
Section: Remeshing Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This dynamically changing mesh induces evolving boundary conditions which need to be dealt with (boundary conditions for such simulations include convection and radiation boundary conditions and a heat flux boundary condition to model the heat input). The solution to handle this dynamically changing mesh is to follow a similar approach as the element-deletion algorithm implemented in Metafor in the scope of crack propagation [2]. This implementation allows the deactivation of finite elements based on certain failure criteria.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%