2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2021.04.109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Improved Delegated Proof of Stake Consensus Algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to related efforts, we introduce a novel contribution that uses multiple criteria, such as trust and contribution level, to identify node producers. Our approach, therefore, has a similarity to the research of Hu et al [23] and Sun et al [24]. Particularly, the authors utilize the trust level of each node to select suitable block producers to remove malicious nodes and enhance security.…”
Section: Distributionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Compared to related efforts, we introduce a novel contribution that uses multiple criteria, such as trust and contribution level, to identify node producers. Our approach, therefore, has a similarity to the research of Hu et al [23] and Sun et al [24]. Particularly, the authors utilize the trust level of each node to select suitable block producers to remove malicious nodes and enhance security.…”
Section: Distributionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…DPoS networks typically have higher transaction throughput and lower latency compared to PoW and PoS, as they rely on a smaller number of trusted validators [31]. DPoS is designed to be more scalable than PoW and PoS, as it can handle increased nodes and transactions more efficiently due to its delegated validation process [33]. DPoS is more energy-efficient than PoW, as it does not require resource-intensive mining [34].…”
Section: Findings and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a POW mechanism consumes considerable computing power, whereas in a proof‐of‐stake (POS) mechanism, the concentration of equity results in low fairness [23]. The delegated POS (DPOS) mechanism attempts to improve upon both POW and POS mechanisms, but it is highly centralized, lacks fairness, and has high costs [24], making it unsuitable for practical application scenarios that focus on decentralization and fairness. Byzantine fault‐tolerant (BFT) algorithms such as PBFT have the advantages of second‐level consensus, eventual consistency, and no power consumption and can resist malicious tampering with information by nodes, but the complexity of these algorithms depends on the number of nodes [25].…”
Section: Fisco Bcos Blockchain Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%