2022
DOI: 10.3390/sym14050979
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Improved EDAS Method for the Multi-Attribute Decision Making Based on the Dynamic Expectation Level of Decision Makers

Abstract: The improved evaluation based on the distance from average solution (EDAS) of the interval-valued intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy set is proposed. At first, we propose a new distance between interval-valued intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy numbers according to their interval endpoints and centroid point, and its properties are also discussed. Furthermore, we apply the proposed distance measure to calculate the expectation level of the emergency plan, and the optimal dynamic expectation level of the emergency … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although using other techniques like simulation-based approaches could lead to more reliable results, it will increase the complexity of solving the mathematical models. Future research can focus on integration of the proposed methodology with other weighting and MCDM methods like WASPAS [57], EDAS [58], COPRAS [59], SWARA II (Stepwise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis II) [60], MEREC (MEthod based on the Removal Effects of Criteria) [61], FUCOM (FUll COnsistency Method) [62] etc. Moreover, extension of the proposed methodology in different uncertain environments could be another area for future research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although using other techniques like simulation-based approaches could lead to more reliable results, it will increase the complexity of solving the mathematical models. Future research can focus on integration of the proposed methodology with other weighting and MCDM methods like WASPAS [57], EDAS [58], COPRAS [59], SWARA II (Stepwise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis II) [60], MEREC (MEthod based on the Removal Effects of Criteria) [61], FUCOM (FUll COnsistency Method) [62] etc. Moreover, extension of the proposed methodology in different uncertain environments could be another area for future research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The steps for implementing the EDAS method [54][55][56] for multi-criteria decisions were as follows:…”
Section: Edas Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first group comprises methods that do not require information about the criteria, such as the domination method, MAXIMIN method, and MAXIMAX method. The second group consists of methods that necessitate specific information about the criteria, including MABAC (Multi-Attributive Border Approximation Area Comparison) [12,13], TOPSIS (Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) [14][15][16][17], EDAS [18][19][20][21], MAIRCA (Multi-Attributive Ideal-Real Comparative Analysis) [22], VIKOR (Višekriterijumsko kompromisno rangiranje) [15], AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) [12,16,23,24], SAW (Simple Additive Weighting) [25], and so on.…”
Section: Approach To Multiple Criteria Decision Making (Mcdm) and Inp...mentioning
confidence: 99%