2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10586-017-1213-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An improved load balanced metaheuristic scheduling in cloud

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This strategy has been simulated with cloud sim toolkit package. The results proved that the proposed algorithm gave better performance than the Min-Min, PSO, and FCFS methods [26]. Jena proposed a method that focused on task scheduling using a Multi-Objective nested Particle Swarm Optimization (MOPSO) to make the best of energy and processing time.…”
Section: Ct=extm+∑mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This strategy has been simulated with cloud sim toolkit package. The results proved that the proposed algorithm gave better performance than the Min-Min, PSO, and FCFS methods [26]. Jena proposed a method that focused on task scheduling using a Multi-Objective nested Particle Swarm Optimization (MOPSO) to make the best of energy and processing time.…”
Section: Ct=extm+∑mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In [32], a model for load balancing on the Internet is presented, aiming to reduce the overall processing time for different tasks. In the other work, both the firefly algorithm and particle swarm optimization are made to balance the load of the entire system and reduce the makespan as well [33]. In [34], the MOGWO method, which is one of the multi-objective algorithms, is used to distribute data equitably among virtual machines and to reduce the working time.…”
Section: Algorithms In Service Allocationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Distributed load Iranpour et al [20] two dynamic work load balancing are engaged in managing the load of the large scale SAAS. Here the fuzzy is used in the admission control for the cloud and the game theory is employed in the first layer load balancing, where the next layer uses either the RR or the LCM and Randles et al [18] the heuristics Li, et al [9], Zhao et al [31], LD et al [32], Adamuthe et al [42] and the metaheuristic aruna et al [45], the heuristics and the metaheuristic approaches for the load balancing employs the optimization technique based on the honey bee, PSO, GA, Tabu search and machine learning techniques for the balancing of the loads and enhance the performance in terms of response time, resource utilization, cost and the processing time.…”
Section: Survey On Virtual-balancing For Loads On M-cloudmentioning
confidence: 99%