2015
DOI: 10.1088/1748-0221/10/03/p03025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An improved measurement of electron-ion recombination in high-pressure xenon gas

Abstract: We report on results obtained with the NEXT-DEMO prototype of the NEXT-100 high-pressure xenon gas time projection chamber (TPC), filled with pure xenon gas at 10 bar pressure and exposed to an alpha decay calibration source. Compared to our previous measurements with alpha particles, an upgraded detector and improved analysis techniques have been used. We measure event-by-event correlated fluctuations between ionization and scintillation due to electronion recombination in the gas, with correlation coefficien… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The normalization factor against an air ionization chamber is seen to decrease by about 7% for a 100 MeV reduction in beam energy, with roughly one-third of the reduction resulting from the known difference between xenon and air in the energy dependence of proton stopping power. The remainder of the effect might arise from energy dependence in the number of scintillation photons produced per keV of energy deposit in xenon (e.g., see Table 1 in Serra et al 2014), but there are no precise measurements in the literature of xenon scintillation yield vs. incident energy. Data for the number of ion pairs produced per MeV deposited in air are more precise (Jones et al 2007), but still cannot rule out a few percent change with incident proton energy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The normalization factor against an air ionization chamber is seen to decrease by about 7% for a 100 MeV reduction in beam energy, with roughly one-third of the reduction resulting from the known difference between xenon and air in the energy dependence of proton stopping power. The remainder of the effect might arise from energy dependence in the number of scintillation photons produced per keV of energy deposit in xenon (e.g., see Table 1 in Serra et al 2014), but there are no precise measurements in the literature of xenon scintillation yield vs. incident energy. Data for the number of ion pairs produced per MeV deposited in air are more precise (Jones et al 2007), but still cannot rule out a few percent change with incident proton energy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By detecting the fast scintillation light directly, one bypasses problems associated with ion-ion recombination, which occurs over much longer time scales. For the GSD we have chosen xenon as the scintillating gas, due to its high scintillation light yield and negligible self-absorption of the resulting photons (Policarpo 1981, Serra et al 2014). The primary scintillation photons, in the vacuum ultraviolet (VUV) range peaked at a wavelength near 175 nm, result from the decay of the diatomic (dimer) states, Xe 2 *→2Xe + photon.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Based on the results of previous studies on the relation between recombination and electric field [21,22], we chose a target uniformity of ±5% for the intensity of the drift field. Note that these previous studies are conducted with alpha particles from 222 Rn in [21] and 241 Am in [22]. The rate of recombination for ionization by alpha particles is higher than the one for ionization by electrons.…”
Section: Drift Electric Field and Field Cagementioning
confidence: 99%