The
combination of chemical enhanced oil recovery (CEOR) and low salinity water (LSW) flooding is one of the
most attractive enhanced oil recovery (EOR) methods. While several
studies on CEOR have been performed to date, there still exists a
lack of mechanistic understanding on the synergism between surfactant,
alkali and LSW. This synergism, in terms of fluid–fluid interactions,
is experimentally investigated in this study, and mechanistic understanding
is gained through fluid analysis techniques. Two surfactants, one
cationic and one anionic, namely an alkyltrimethylammonium bromide
(C19TAB) and sodium dodecylbenzenesulfonate (SDBS), were
tested, together with NaOH used as the alkali, diluted formation brine
used as the LSW, and the crude oil was collected from an Iranian carbonate
oil reservoir. Fluids were analyzed using pendant drop method for
interfacial tension (IFT) measurement, and Fourier transform infrared
spectroscopy for determination of aqueous and oleic phase chemical
interaction. The optimum concentration of LSW for IFT reduction was
investigated to be 1000 ppm. Additionally, both surfactants reduced
IFT significantly, from 28.86 mN/m to well below 0.80 mN/m, but in
the presence of optimal alkali concentration the IFT dropped further
to below 0.30 mN/m. IFT reduction by alkali was linked to the production
of three different types of in situ anionic surfactants, while in
the case of anionic and cationic surfactants, saponification reactions
and the formation of the C19TAOH alcohol, respectively,
were linked to IFT reduction. The critical micelle concentration and
optimal alkali concentration when using cationic C19TAB
were significantly lower than with the anionic surfactant; respectively:
335 vs 5000 ppm, and 500 vs 5000 ppm. However, it was found that SDBS
was more compatible with NaOH than C19TAB, due to occurrence
of alkali deposition with the latter beyond the optimal point.