An Improved Model for Requirement Management System

Hafeez, Mohammad Salman; Rasheed, Farhan; Mr, Khan

doi:10.4172/2165-7866.1000196

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“… Supporting project planning: This activity covers human resource management, acquisition and scope management, quality management, risk management, communication management, cost and time management etc [13].  Monitoring and supervising requirements: This phase supports to monitor the requirements status in a different point of view, control changing requirements due to various reasons, tracing requirements, etc [14].  Assuring quality of requirements: This helps in quality assessment concerning the requirements management, from inception to current state and complete requirements specification to explain these requirements [15].…”

Section: Requirements Management Processmentioning

confidence: 99%

Revisiting Requirement Engineering Techniques: Managerial Perspective

Sharma,

Pandey

2020

IJEAT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In Requirement Engineering, Requirements Management (RM) is one of the significant phases that can control the success of a software project. It manages deal between dependencies and requirements, modifications to the approved requirements and connection between other documents as well as the requirements document formed during the process of requirement engineering. In the world of software development, it is estimated that changes to requirements and poor requirement management are one of the major causes for project overrun and quality issues in software development. The practice of requirements management methodologies, with the support of traceability and quantification, is renowned as a substantial ability in the software maintenance and development process, and as an essential aspect for the quality of the final software product. The present study is accompanied by an acute assessment of the current methods for managing and resolving software requirements. It also highlights the management concerns that arise in the said process . Result analysis rveal that there are still numerous issues, which require immediate attention of research community in order to develop a quality software.

show abstract

Section: Requirements Management Processmentioning

confidence: 99%

Revisiting Requirement Engineering Techniques: Managerial Perspective

Sharma,

Pandey

2020

IJEAT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It is crucial to get the "right" requirements from the clients and put the requirements in the "right" place (Hafeez, Rasheed, and Khan, 2017). Nevertheless, constantly changing requirements may end up in a large-scale system and require much effort in managing the details to ensure the information is always up to date.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

ReqGo: A Semi-Automated Requirements Management Tool

Koh¹,

Chua²

2023

IJTech

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study deals with issues of changes in requirements management by dealing with requirements ambiguity and prioritization. A hypothesis about the possibility of integrating machine learning techniques and requirements management processes has been proven. It highlights the efforts in automating requirements ambiguity identification, requirements classification, and prioritization considering multi-criteria in decision-making through the utilization of Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques and Universal Sentence Encoder. Naïve Bayes (NB) classifier has been applied with its remarkable performance on binarily classifying requirements. Although existing methods proved to improve one or two of the process significantly, it rarely integrates the whole requirements management activity. The proposed tool helps the development team to manage the requirements systematically. The prioritization algorithm is proved to work as expected by considering multiple constraints before calculating the priority value. Meanwhile, it identifies the ambiguity that exists in the requirement automatically. The ambiguity classifier successfully identifies 87.5% of requirements accurately. Possible future work could be done in improving the prioritization module by allowing automated estimation of priority value upon requirements change. Future work may extend the automation coverage by providing test case generation.

show abstract

An Improved Model for Requirement Management System

Cited by 2 publications

References 3 publications

Revisiting Requirement Engineering Techniques: Managerial Perspective

Revisiting Requirement Engineering Techniques: Managerial Perspective

ReqGo: A Semi-Automated Requirements Management Tool

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About