2019
DOI: 10.1504/ijsn.2019.100087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An improved multi-objective genetic algorithm and data fusion in structural damage identification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e interest of the scientific community in damage identification is highlighted by the great variety of presented computational procedures such as genetic algorithms [32][33][34], metaheuristic algorithms [35], particle swarm optimization [36], fuzzy cognitive maps [37], digital image correlation [38], vision-based measurements [39], neural networks [40], and wavelet analysis [41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…e interest of the scientific community in damage identification is highlighted by the great variety of presented computational procedures such as genetic algorithms [32][33][34], metaheuristic algorithms [35], particle swarm optimization [36], fuzzy cognitive maps [37], digital image correlation [38], vision-based measurements [39], neural networks [40], and wavelet analysis [41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some contributions on crack modeling approaches and their effects on the response of beams can be found in [45,46]. Several papers consider the joints between beams and columns as possible damage locations [33,[47][48][49].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other machine learning techniques such as support vector machine (SVM) [11][12][13], fuzzy neural network (FNN) [14,15], optimization algorithms such as genetic algorithm (GA) [16][17][18][19], multiverse optimizer (MVO) algorithm [20], and grey wolf optimization (GWO) algorithm [21] have also been used in SHM and damage detection of civil structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3) Multi-data fusion methods. By combining data from diverse sources, such as SAR, LiDAR, optical cameras, and geographical information system (GIS) data, some complex and detailed information on building damage can be accurately extracted [18]. Although these fusion methods have brought some improvements to the extraction of building damage information, several issues need to be resolved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%