2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106293
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An improved sine–cosine algorithm for simultaneous network reconfiguration and DG allocation in power distribution systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
57
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
57
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One such endeavor is simultaneous control of DSRs and allocation of DGs. As such, recent studies to the implementation of an effective integration strategy has been presented; for example; manta ray foraging optimization [1]; harmony search algorithm (HSA) with an objective of minimizing real power loss and improving voltage profile [29]; combined GA and branch exchange [30]; artificial bee colony optimizer based on maximization of system loadability [31]; improved spotted hyena algorithm [32], improved elitist-jaya algorithm (IEJAYA) [5], FWA [33], firefly (FF) algorithm [34], sinecosine algorithm [35], Harris Hawks Optimizer (HHO) [36], invasive weed optimizer [37], salp swarm algorithm [38] and an improved beetle swarm optimization algorithm [39]. In [40], multi-objective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO) and non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA-II) have been applied effectively for DGs allocation in distribution systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One such endeavor is simultaneous control of DSRs and allocation of DGs. As such, recent studies to the implementation of an effective integration strategy has been presented; for example; manta ray foraging optimization [1]; harmony search algorithm (HSA) with an objective of minimizing real power loss and improving voltage profile [29]; combined GA and branch exchange [30]; artificial bee colony optimizer based on maximization of system loadability [31]; improved spotted hyena algorithm [32], improved elitist-jaya algorithm (IEJAYA) [5], FWA [33], firefly (FF) algorithm [34], sinecosine algorithm [35], Harris Hawks Optimizer (HHO) [36], invasive weed optimizer [37], salp swarm algorithm [38] and an improved beetle swarm optimization algorithm [39]. In [40], multi-objective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO) and non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA-II) have been applied effectively for DGs allocation in distribution systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimal DNR and CBs placement are presented in literature such as improved binary PSO [18], hybrid shuffled frog leaping algorithm in the fuzzy framework [19]. In addition to this, optimal DNR and DGs placement are manifested in literature based on various algorithms such as the dataset approach and water cycle algorithm [4], improved elitist-Jaya algorithm [7], and improved sine-cosine algorithm [20]. Furthermore, optimal DGs and CBs placement in distribution systems has been manifested in various articles using meta-heuristic techniques such as the water cycle algorithm [2], PSO [3], genetic algorithm [6], and enhanced grey wolf algorithm [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [ 29 ], harmony search (HS) and teaching–learning-based optimization (TLBO) are hybridized for forming comprehensive teaching learning harmony search optimization algorithm (CTLHSO) and applied to solve simultaneous DGs and reconfiguration problem for minimizing the loss and voltage deviation from reference bus considering different loading levels. In [ 30 ], improved sin-cosine algorithm (SCA) with levy flights is proposed and optimized for multi-objective function with loss and voltage stability index via determining the optimal branches to open and tie-lines to close, for forming optimal reconfiguration and location and sizes of DGs. In [ 31 ], a new thief and police algorithm (TPA) is proposed and applied for solving the renewable DGs and capacitor allocation along with the reconfiguration problem considering loss, voltage stability and operational cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%