2020
DOI: 10.21303/2504-5679.2020.001364
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Improved Transabdominal Preperitoneal Alloplasty for Recurrent Inguinal Hernias After Lichtenstein’s Surgery

Abstract: The aim. Improve results of the surgical treatment of recurrent inguinal hernias after Lichtenstein's surgery by using an advanced TAPP technique. Materials and methods. An analysis of the surgical treatment of patients with recurrent inguinal hernias after Lichtenstein's surgery using traditional and improved preperitoneal transabdominal alloplasty (TAPP), for the period of 2012–2019, was performed. The traditional TAPP technique was performed for 52 patients who made up the 1st group. An improved TAPP techn… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At first, the laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR) was introduced by R. Ger et al in 1990 [5]. LIHR has become popular worldwide because laparoscopic placement of mesh behind the defect where, according to Laplace's Law, the same forces that cause hernia are used to reinforce the repair [4]. The totally extraperitoneal method (TEP) established by J. L. Dulucq in Europe allows access to the pre-peritoneal space and avoids the need for a peritoneal incision [3].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At first, the laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR) was introduced by R. Ger et al in 1990 [5]. LIHR has become popular worldwide because laparoscopic placement of mesh behind the defect where, according to Laplace's Law, the same forces that cause hernia are used to reinforce the repair [4]. The totally extraperitoneal method (TEP) established by J. L. Dulucq in Europe allows access to the pre-peritoneal space and avoids the need for a peritoneal incision [3].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%