2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2020.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An improved whale optimization algorithm with armed force program and strategic adjustment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A comparison of the optimal solution and statistical results are presented in Tables 9 and 10, respectively. It is observed that the optimal solution by TPSA is superior to PSA, CPSO [47], IGMM [48], TEO [49], IGWO [50], SFOA [51], CS-BSA [52], and WAROA [53] and is equivalent to the results of AEO [46]. However, the mean and standard deviation of TPSA are better than those of AEO.…”
Section: Welded-beam Design Problemmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A comparison of the optimal solution and statistical results are presented in Tables 9 and 10, respectively. It is observed that the optimal solution by TPSA is superior to PSA, CPSO [47], IGMM [48], TEO [49], IGWO [50], SFOA [51], CS-BSA [52], and WAROA [53] and is equivalent to the results of AEO [46]. However, the mean and standard deviation of TPSA are better than those of AEO.…”
Section: Welded-beam Design Problemmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…where .05 ≤ x 1 ≤ 2.00, 0.25 ≤ x 2 ≤ 1.30, and 2.00 ≤ x 3 ≤ 15.00. e population size was set to 50; the maximum number of iterations was 1,000; the step-size scaling 11 and 12, respectively. Tables 11 and 12 show that the optimal solution of TPSA is superior to PSA, HMPA [4], AEO [46], CPSO [47], IGWO [50], SFOA [51], and PO [54] and is equivalent to the results of the TEO [49] and WAROA [53]. However, the worst and average values of TPSA are better than those of WAROA.…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…To verify the optimization performance of the PRN-SSA for basic test functions, the basic sparrow search algorithm (SSA) [40], improved sparrow search algorithm (GGSC-SSA) [41], particle swarm optimization algorithm (PSO) [42], grey wolf optimizer algorithm (GWO) [43], whale optimization algorithm (WOA) [44], and harris hawk optimization algorithm (HHO) [45] are compared with PRN-SSA. On the one hand, it aims to judge whether the improvement of this research can exceed the performance of other SSA and its variants, and on the other hand, it can reflect the optimization ability of the improved sparrow algorithm compared with other precision algorithms.…”
Section: Comparison Algorithms and Parameter Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A numerical example for minmax regret EC 39,3 (WOA) is a novel meta-heuristic optimization algorithm proposed by Mirjalili and Lewis in 2016, inspired by the unique "bubble-net" hunting strategy of humpback whales (Mirjalili and Lewis, 2016). The WOA is chosen because it has been proven to perform better in terms of convergence speed and accuracy over many other meta-heuristic optimizers such as Particle Swarm Optimization, Ant Colony Optimization, Differential Evolution and Evolution Strategy (Jiang et al, 2020). However, the search process of the WOA has the disadvantage of a low exploitation speed and accuracy.…”
Section: Robust Optimization Of Line Balancing Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%