2011
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/730/2/63
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An in-Depth Study of Grid-Based Asteroseismic Analysis

Abstract: NASA's Kepler mission is providing basic asteroseismic data for hundreds of stars. One of the more common ways of determining stellar characteristics from these data is by so-called "grid based" modelling. We have made a detailed study of grid-based analysis techniques to study the errors (and error-correlations) involved. As had been reported earlier, we find that it is relatively easy to get very precise values of stellar radii using grid-based techniques. However, we find that there are small, but significa… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
219
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 178 publications
(230 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
11
219
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For 3 models, the age of the binary system is in the range 3.4-3.9 Gyr while for Ball the age is about 2.7 Gyr. All models return a very consistent log g for either star; this is the result of the very tight correlation between M and R as shown by (Gai et al 2011). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…For 3 models, the age of the binary system is in the range 3.4-3.9 Gyr while for Ball the age is about 2.7 Gyr. All models return a very consistent log g for either star; this is the result of the very tight correlation between M and R as shown by (Gai et al 2011). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…These values can be used to derive a first estimate of the stellar mass and radius using scaling relations. Gai et al (2011) noted that since the errors in these estimates of the mass and radius are positively correlated, the error we obtain in the quantity M/R 2 and thus in log g is small. We report in Table 1 the estimated values of M, R, and log g, which are later confronted with those of our best-fit models.…”
Section: Seismic Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…For example, Stello et al (2009a) compared the radius determined from different automatic analyses using simulated data and find that the radius can be determined with a precision of 3%. Gai et al (2011) made a detailed study of grid-based methods for asteroseismology using simulated data and also solar data. They investigated the errors in the parameters and concluded that the surface gravity can be determined with practically no systematic bias.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%