2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2015.03.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An in situ antimicrobial susceptibility testing method based on in vivo measurements of chlorophyll α fluorescence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…nm thick coating. Their antibacterial behavior was studied according to an in situ method of fluorescence measurement, which has recently been developed and described in previous works 35,36 (see section 2.6 and the Supporting Information). Figure 4 shows the comparison of these two metals.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Antibacterial Action Of Silver Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…nm thick coating. Their antibacterial behavior was studied according to an in situ method of fluorescence measurement, which has recently been developed and described in previous works 35,36 (see section 2.6 and the Supporting Information). Figure 4 shows the comparison of these two metals.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Antibacterial Action Of Silver Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where F 0 0 is the fluorescence value at zero contact time and F 0 i is the fluorescence value after 1, 2, ..., i days. Of notice, F 0 has been proved to be directly correlated to the bacterial population and the M i evolution to the increase/decrease of the population [48]. In particular, negative values of the M i index are indicative of a decline in bacterial population, therefore of an antibacterial behavior of the testing surface.…”
Section: Antibacterial Susceptibility Testing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…An in situ quantitative method for the assessment of the antibacterial properties of the fabricated surfaces was used, based on in vivo measurements of chlorophyll (Chl α) fluorescence of cyanobacteria directly deposited on the surfaces, as a faithful representation of their real life conditions [48,49]. The method has been tested and evaluated for its accuracy compared to the AATCC 100-2004 method, which is used as a standard for the evaluation of the antibacterial properties [48]. More specifically, it has been demonstrated [49] that this method employing cyanobacteria can monitor the behavior of either phototrophic or heterotrophic bacterial metabolic pathways on antibacterial surfaces.…”
Section: Antibacterial Susceptibility Testing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations